Old SDA Pioneer's (Part of the 144,000) God vs New SDA's (Laodicean/Foolish Virgin) Trinity of Gods

The Bible is within the reach of all, but there are few who really accept it as the guide of life.

"the final movements will be rapid ones"—Testimonies for the Church 9:11.

"We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Many of the prophecies are about to be fulfilled in quick succession. Every element of power is about to be set to work. Past history will be repeated; old controversies will arouse to new life, and peril will beset God's people on every side. Intensity is taking hold of the human family. It is permeating everything upon the earth. Study Revelation in connection with Daniel, for history will be repeated" - Testimonies to Ministers, p. 116.

Here is a great video that shows exactly how the early SDA pioneers believed about God and His Son, here.

Another great short video here.

"I saw that the greater the light which the people reject, the greater will be the power of deception and darkness which will come upon them. The rejection of truth leaves men captives, the subjects of Satan’s deception. - 1T 232.1 (Ellen White).

What is the Trinity?
The Trinity - started with Noah's great-grandson Nimrod, Semiramis, and Tammuz. Noah had 3 sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Ham had a son named Cush, Cush had a daughter named Semiramis. Cush had an incestuous relationship with his daughter and Nimrod was born of this union. So Semiramis was Nimrod's sister and Mother. Semiramis later married her son Nimrod. So now add Semiramis was the sister, Mother and, wife of her son Nimrod. Nimrod was a mighty hunter. Nimrod was rebellious against the Commandments of God. Nimrod built the tower of Babel and gained a great following. He was worshiped as a god and so was his wife. He was very wicked and later was killed. His wife said he went to the SUN...so hence comes SUN DAY worship on the first day. Semiramis fornicated and got pregnant. To cover up her sin she said that a RAY OF THE SUN impregnated her and it was an immaculate conception. Her baby - which she said was NIMROD reincarnated was born on December 25 and she named him TAMMUZ. This is the counterfeit miracle birth of another Jesus (2 Cor 11:3-4) that we have been warned against by Paul in Col 2:8. The whole world bows down and worships this TRINITY today, which is simply renamed into Biblical "sounding" names to deceive IF POSSIBLE the very elect called "God the Father", "God the Son", and "God the Holy Spirit". There is so much to this - but this is just a synopsis of the problem from which the Trinity of gods originates. The Trinity has it's roots in paganism, pedophilia, child molestation and incest. Wonder why there are so many problems for people who worship the Trinity? It is Satan setting himself up showing HIMSELF that HE is god. 2 Thessalonians 2:4 NIV "He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God."

Believing in a Trinity Holy Ghost is blaspheming God !!

“What constitutes the sin against the Holy Ghost? It is willfully attributing to Satan the work of the Holy Spirit.” — (E.G. White, 5T 634.1, 1889

Ellen White gives another definition for blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

“The sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit does not lie in any sudden word or deed; it is the firm, determined resistance of truth and evidence.” — (E.G. White, Manuscript 30, 1890)

It is not rejecting someone called “god the holy spirit.” It is resisting Truth and Evidence!

Was Jesus the Son of God before His Incarnation?

Trinitarians often claim that Jesus is only called the Son of God because of His birth in Bethlehem. But being born in human flesh, Christ became the “Son of man” at His incarnation, not the “Son of God” which He already was. Scripture reveals many times and in many ways that Jesus was God's Son “before” God sent Him into the world, not after. The following two verses for instance say that God sent His Son into the world. Hence He was already God's Son before He sent Him.

“because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.” 1 John 4:9

“For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” John 3:17

And God's Son was in the fiery furnace with the faithful three over 500 years before His incarnation. “Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.” Daniel 3:25

Scripture also informs us that Jesus was the Son of God before all things were created. Paul wrote in regards to Christ that, “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.” Colossians 1:15 NKJV. Note that the latter part of this verse is poorly translated in the KJV which says, “Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.” Colossians 1:15 KJV. As a result there are some who use the King James Bible to imply that Christ Himself was a created being. But such an interpretation is contradicted elsewhere in Scripture such as John 1:1-4 and Colossians 1:16-17

Thus we see that Paul is telling us that Christ was “Begotten First or Born Before all creation” because all of creation was by God through His Son Jesus Christ. “And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world has been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ.” Ephesians 3:9

Ellen White confirms also needless to say.

“The dedication of the first-born had its origin in the earliest times. God had promised to give the First-born of heaven to save the sinner.” — (E.G. White, DA, p. 51)

“God sent His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, liable to physical infirmities, tempted in all points like as we are. He was the Son of the living God. His personality did not begin with His incarnation in the flesh.” — (E.G. White, Lt77, Aug 3, 1894)

Thayer's Greek Lexicon says, “Christ is called, firstborn of all creation, who came into being through God prior to the entire universe of created things.” Barnes New Testament Notes on Colossians 1:15 says, “the word firstborn - pro-tot-ok'-os - properly means the firstborn child of a father or mother.” Jamieson, Fausset and Brown Commentary says, “Begotten (literally, 'born') before every creature.” Matthew Henry's Commentary states “He was born or begotten before all the creation, before any creature was made;”

Scripture refers to Jesus Christ as “the image of God,” “the image of the invisible God,” and “the express image of his person.” (2 Corinthians 4:4; Colossians 1:15; Hebrews 1:3). An image is never the original but always a likeness or duplication of the original. Christ is the Son of God and therefore the express image of His Father. It would be incorrect to say that the Father is the image of His Son because the Father is the original. In the same manner it would be incorrect to refer to Christ as the true or original God since He is the image of the true God.

The Bible refers to Christ as God's Son at least 120 times. Forty seven times using the phrase “Son of God.” Regarding the genuineness of Christ's Sonship, He is called the “only begotten” six times, “the firstborn” three times, “the firstbegotten” once and God's “holy child” twice. Four verses say He was “begotten” prior to His incarnation so this cannot be applied to His birth on earth from Mary as some have chosen to believe. Four verses say that He “proceeded forth from,” “came out from” or “camest forth from” the Father. The evidence on this subject is overwhelming. Christ truly is the literal begotten Son of God who was brought forth from the Father before all creation. The example verses below with the help of the Thayer dictionary also reveal that Jesus was born of the Father before the world was, then much later, He came into the world.

Thayer's Greek-English Lexicon
G1831 - To come forth from physically, arise from, to be born of.
G2064 - To come from one place to another.

John 8:42 “Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, you would love me: for I proceeded forth [G1831] and came from God; neither came [G2064] I of myself, but he sent me.”

John 16:27-28 “For the Father himself loveth you, because you have loved me, and have believed that I came out [G1831] from God. 28 I came forth [G1831] from the Father, and am come [G2064] into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father.”

John 17:7-8 “Now they have known that all things whatsoever you have given me are of you. 8 For I have given unto them the words which you gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out [G1831] from you, and they have believed that you did send me.”

Image may contain: one or more people and text

What the Adventist Pioneers believed about the Trinity doctrine

It is well documented that the Seventh-Day Adventist church was non-Trinitarian from it's original gathering and formation in the 1850's up until 1980 when the God of the General Conference was brought in.  Sister White prophesied in 1903 that "our religion would be changed."  Trinitarian converts that had come in began the majority and it was only a matter of time and the Theologians and Scholars would take over and change the doctrines that God gave to it's remnant church.




"The great mistake of Trinitarians, in arguing this subject, seems to be this: They make no distinction between a denial of a Trinity and a denial of the divinity of Christ. They see only the two extremes, between which the truth lies; and take every expression referring to the pre-existence of Christ as evidence of a Trinity. The Scriptures abundantly teach the pre-existence of Christ and his divinity; but they are entirely silent in regard to a Trinity." -  J.H. Waggoner, The Atonement, 1872 ed, chapter 4, "Doctrine Of A Trinity Subversive Of The Atonement" p. 165.  


“Many theologians really think that the Atonement, in respect to its dignity and efficacy, rests upon the doctrine of a trinity. But we fail to see any connection between the two. To the contrary, the advocates of that doctrine really fall into the difficulty which they seem anxious to avoid. Their difficulty consists in this: They take the denial of a trinity to be equivalent to a denial of the divinity of Christ. Were that the case, we should cling to the doctrine of a trinity as tenaciously as any can; but it is not the case. They who have read our remarks on the death of the Son of God know that we firmly believe in the divinity of Christ; but we cannot accept the idea of a trinity, as it is held by Trinitarians, without giving up our claim on the dignity of the sacrifice made for our redemption.” - J.H.Waggoner, ‘The Atonement in Light of Nature and Revelation’, 1884 Edition, chapter ‘Doctrine of a Trinity Subversive of the Atonement’



"We will make a few extracts, that the reader may see the broad contrast between the God of the Bible brought to light through Sabbath-keeping, and the god in the dark through Sunday-keeping. Catholic Catechism Abridged by the Rt. Rev. John Dubois, Bishop of New York. Page 5. 'Q. Where is God? Ans. God is everywhere. Q. Does God see and know all things? A. Yes, he does know and see all things...Q. Are there more Gods than one? A. No; there is but one God. Q. Are there more persons than one in God? A Yes; in God there are three persons. Q. Which are they? A. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost. Q. Are there not three Gods? A. No; the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, are all but one and the same God'...These ideas well accord with those heathen philosophers...We should rather mistrust that the Sunday God [the Trinity] came from the same source that Sunday-keeping did." – J.B. Frisbie, Review and Herald, Feb. 28, 1854, The Sunday God, p.50. [emphasis supplied].



"The word Trinity nowhere occurs in the Scriptures. The principal text supposed to teach it is 1 John 5:7, which is an interpolation. Clarke says, 'Out of one hundred and thirteen manuscripts, the text is wanting in one hundred and twelve. It occurs in no MS. before the tenth century. And the first place the text occurs in Greek, is in the Greek translation of the acts of the Council of Latern, held A.D. 1215.'-Com. on John 1, and remarks at close of chap."

"Almost any portion of the New Testament we may open which has occasion to speak of the Father and Son, represents them as two distinct persons. The seventeenth chapter of John is alone sufficient to refute the doctrine of the trinity." – J.N. Loughborough, Review and Herald, Nov. 5, 1861.


"Questions for Bro. Loughborough. Bro. White: The following questions I would like to have you give, or send, to Bro. Loughborough for explanation. W. W. Giles, Toledo, Ohio Question 1. What serious objections is there to the doctrine of the Trinity? ANSWER. There are many objections which we might urge, but on account of our limited space we shall reduce them to the three following: 1. It is contrary to common sense. 2. It is contrary to scripture. 3. Its origin is pagan and fabulous... Instead of pointing us to scripture for proof of the Trinity, we are pointed to the trident of the Persians...This doctrine of the Trinity was brought into the church about the same time with image worship, and keeping the day of the sun, and is but Persian doctrine remodeled. It occupied about three hundred years from its introduction to bring the doctrine to what it is now. It was commenced about 325 A.D., and was not completed till 681. See Milman's Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv, p. 422. It was adopted in Spain in 589, in England in 596, in Africa in 534.-Gib. vol. iv, pp. 114, 345; Milner, vol. i, p. 519." – J.N. Loughborough, Review & Herald, Nov. 5, 1861.



"…We understand that the term trinity means the union of three persons, not offices, in one God: so that The Father, Son and Holy Ghost, Are three at least, and one at most. That one person is three persons, and that three persons are only one person, is the doctrine which we claim is contrary to reason and common sense. The being and attributes of God are above, beyond, out of reach of my sense and reason, yet I believe them": But the doctrine I object to is contrary, yes, that is the word, to the very sense and reason that God has himself implanted in us. Such a doctrine he does not ask us to believe. A miracle is beyond our comprehension, but we all believe in miracles who believe our own senses. What we see and hear convinces us that there is a power that affected the most wonderful miracle of creation. But our Creator has made it an absurdity to us that one person should be three persons, and three persons but one person; and in his revealed word he has never asked us to believe it. This our friend thinks objectionable... "But to hold the doctrine of the Trinity is not so much an evidence of evil intention as of intoxication from that wine of which all the nations have drunk. The fact that this was one of the leading doctrines, if not the very chief, upon which the bishop of Rome was exalted to the popedom, does not say much in its favor. This should cause men to investigate it for themselves; as when the spirits of devils working miracles undertake the advocacy of the immortality of the soul. Had I never doubted it before, I would now probe it to the bottom, by that word which modern Spiritualism sets at nought..." Revelation goes beyond us; but in no instance does it go contrary to right reason and common sense. God has not claimed, as the popes have, that he could 'make justice of injustice,' nor has he, after teaching us to count, told us that there is no difference between the singular and plural numbers. Let us believe all he has revealed, and add nothing to it." – R.F. Cottrell, Review and Herald, July 6, 1869.  


"My reasons for not adopting and defending it, are 1. Its name is unscriptural the Trinity, or the triune God, is unknown to the Bible; and I have entertained the idea that doctrines which require words coined in the human mind to express them, are coined doctrines. 2. I have never felt called upon to adopt and explain that which is contrary to all the sense and reason that God has given me. All my attempts at an explanation of such a subject would make it no clearer to my friends..."

– R.F. Cottrell, Review and Herald, June 1, 1869 



“And then the Bible never uses the phrases, "trinity,” "triune God," "three in one," " the holy three,” “God the Holy Ghost," etc. But it does emphatically say there is only one God, the Father. And every argument of the Trinitarian to prove three Gods in one person, God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, all of them of one substance, and every way equal to each other, and all three forming but one, contradicts itself, contradicts reason, and contradicts the Bible.”

– D.M. Canright, Review and Herald, August 29th 1878, ‘The personality of God’



“My parents were members of long standing in the Congregational church, with all of their converted children thus far, and anxiously hoped that we would also unite with them. But they embraced some points in their faith that I could not understand. I will name two only: their mode of baptism, and doctrine of the trinity.” - ‘The Autobiography of Joseph Bates’ page 204, chapter 17, 1868


 “Respecting the trinity, I concluded that it was an impossibility for me to believe that the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, was also the Almighty God, the Father, one and the same being. I said to my father, “If you can convince me that we are one in this sense, that you are my father, and I your son; and also that I am your father, and you my son, then I can believe in the trinity.” - Joseph Bates, Autobiography



"The doctrine of the Trinity which was established in the church by the council of Nice, A. D. 325. This doctrine destroys the personality of God, and his Son Jesus Christ our Lord. The infamous, measures by which it was forced upon the church which appear upon the pages of ecclesiastical history might well cause every believer in that doctrine to blush." – J.N. Andrews, Review & Herald, March 6, 1855,vol. 6, no. 24, page 185



“What a contradiction of terms is found in the language of Trinitarian creed: “In unity of this head are three persons, of one substance, power, and eternity, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.” There are many things that are mysterious, written in the word of God, but we may safely presume the Lord never calls upon us to believe impossibilities. But creeds often do.” - A. J. Dennis, May 22, 1879, Signs of The Times



“The idea of Father and Son supposes priority of the existence of the one, and the subsequent existence of the other. To say that the Son is as old as his Father, is a palpable contradiction of terms. It is a natural impossibility for the Father to be as young as the Son, or the Son to be as old as the Father”.  – J. M. Stephenson, Review & Herald, vol. 6, #14, pg. 105, November, 14, 1854



“The doctrine called the trinity claiming that God is without form or parts; that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, the three are one person, is another [false doctrine].”

- Uriah Smith, Review and Herald, July 10th 1856, ‘Communications’



“Protestants and Catholics are so nearly united in sentiment, that it is not difficult to conceive how Protestants may make an image to the Beast. The mass of Protestants believe with Catholics in the Trinity, immortality of the soul, consciousness of the dead, rewards and punishments at death, the endless torture of the wicked, inheritance of the saints beyond the skies, sprinkling for baptism and the PAGAN SUNDAY for the Sabbath; all of which is contrary to the spirit and letter of the new testament. Surely there is between the mother and daughters, a striking family resemblance.” - M. E. Cornell ‘Facts for the Times’ page 76, 1858



“The inconsistent positions held by many in regard to the Trinity, as it is termed, has, no doubt, been the prime cause of many other errors.” - D. W. Hull, Review and Herald, November 10th 1859, ‘Bible doctrine of the divinity of Christ’



“Having noticed some of the evil effects of the doctrine of immortal soulism, and the errors growing out of it, we propose to refer briefly to another erroneous belief, equally popular and quite as unscriptural, if not fully as mischievous in its tendency, namely Trinitarianism.” - W. C. Gage, Review and Herald, August 29th 1865, ‘Popular errors and their fruits No.5’



“We are well aware that there has been much disputation on the subject of the sonship of Christ in the religious world, some claiming that he is nothing but a man as to origin, being only about eighteen hundred years old; others that he is the very and eternal God, the second person in the trinity. This last view is by far the most widely entertained among religious denominations. We are disposed to think that the truth lies between these views.” - H. C. Blanchard, Review and Herald, September 10th 1867, ‘The Son’



“The doctrine of the Trinity is a cruel heathen monstrosity, removing Jesus from his true position of Divine Savior and Mediator.” - Judson Washburn, letter to General Conference, 1940

Jesus was the Son of God before the world was, not at Bethlehem.

  But the Son of God, who was with the Father before the world was, took pity upon us in our lost condition, and offered to step in between us and the wrath of an offended God. Said Jesus, I will give my life for them. I will take the burden of the sins of the world upon men, and will make a way possible for these transgressors to find pardon and enjoy thy favor again, that they may repent and keep thy commandments, and again have access to the tree of life. God consented to give his only Son to die for lost man.  {YI, August 1, 1852 par. 6}  

     The lovely Jesus laid aside his glory, and came into this dark world, and took upon himself our nature, to be wounded for our transgressions, to be bruised for our iniquities. O, what love for us.--He led a self-denying life, and had not where to lay his head. He was a man of sorrow and acquainted with grief, was despised and rejected, and finally was crucified for us.  {YI, August 1, 1852 par. 7}  
     But you must not think that you have nothing to do, because Christ died for you. You must repent of all of your sins, and give your hearts to God, and then believe that the blood of Christ will cleanse you from all sin. Then if you keep all the commandments of God, the Sabbath with the rest you may through the merits of Christ, be brought back to the tree of life. This will be when Jesus comes to raise the righteous dead, and change the living saints. Then you will have right to the tree of life, and eat of the leaves, and immortal fruit of the tree of life and live for ever in perfect happiness.--Read Revelation 22:14.  {YI, August 1, 1852 par. 8} 

     In the next page I will speak of the beauties of the New Earth. 

    He must increase, but I [must] decrease.

"Those who try to bring in theories that would remove the pillars of our faith concerning the sanctuary or concerning the personality of God or of Christ, are working as BLIND MEN" MR769.5.

"Every structure must be built upon a right foundation, in order to stand" 3T, p. 563.

"The LORD possessed me in the beginning of His Way, before his works of old" Proverbs 8:22 KJV.Image may contain: 1 person, text

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the Way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by ME" John 14:6 KJV.

"But this I confess unto thee, that after the Way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets" Acts 24:14.

Acts 9:2
to ask for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he found any men or women belonging to the Way, he could bring them as prisoners to Jerusalem.

Hebrews 9:8
By this arrangement the Holy Spirit was showing that the Way into the Most Holy Place had not yet been disclosed as long as the first tabernacle was still standing.

Hebrews 10:20
by the new and living Way opened for us through the curtain of His body,

"And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [the Way=Jesus Christ] was made a quickening spirit" 1 Cor. 15:45.

Satan is working that the history of the Jewish nation may be repeated in the experience of those who claim to believe present truth" --Selected Messages Book 2, p. 111.1.

If the Son of God was begotten He had a beginning before this earth was created. See Proverbs 8. If the Son of God died He was not immortal. If the Son of God was given the Revelation from His Father He does not have foreknowledge. The Son of God (Jesus) is not Elohim (God the Father per 1 Cor 8:6). The Son of God told us that there is only Elohim (God) and that was His Father. John 17:3.

There are seven verses in the Bible which use the phrase, “one God.” Four of them clearly identify this ONE GOD as a single individual, person, a Image may contain: textsingle being, who is THE FATHER. Not a single one of them identifies this one God as three entities. 

(Mark 12:32) And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he: (GOD IS A “HE.” ONE PERSON)

(1Cor 8:6) But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. (GOD IS A “HIM,” ONE PERSON, THE FATHER)

(Eph 4:6) One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. (GOD IS ONE PERSON, THE FATHER)

(1Tim 2:5) For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (GOD IS ONE PERSON ONLY)

The next verse does not say “one God,” but it says “only true God,” so I have added it to the list.

(John 17:3) And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. (GOD IS ONE PERSON ONLY, THE FATHER OF JESUS)

Here are the other verses which speak about one God. They do not clearly say that God is one single person, but they do not give the slightest hint that God is three persons. Since the Bible does not contradict itself, it is clear that they also are referring exclusively to ONE PERSON.

(Jas 2:19) Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

(Rom 3:30) Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

(Mal 2:10) Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

Why then do some wrest the word of God to make the ONE GOD a three-in-one being?

The ORIGIN of the Trinity, Sunday Worship, Christmas and ALL other false doctrines after the flood (Noah's Ark):

Now let's go back about 5000 years to BABYLON, (in Iraq) to learn of Christmas AND Easter, AND how they began.

After the flood, Noah's son Ham had a son named Cush (Genesis 10:1,6,7,8-11) who had a son Nimrod. NIMROD was a mighty hunter and the first to begin WAR. He built the cities of Babel, and Nineveh. Nineveh was the capital of Assyria as Micah 5:6 tells us: "the land of Assyria with the sword, AND the land of NIMROD in the entrances thereof." Remember that Jonah when he got out of the whale, he walked the 500 miles from Joppa to Nineveh in upper" Iraq" today.

NIMROD'S mother was Semiramis the daughter OF Cush, SO in reality she was NIMROD'S older sister. 
By incest with Cush she became NIMROD'S mother. When he reached manhood SHE married her own son NIMROD, and ruled as QUEEN.  A few Years later she conspired with others and he was killed. She said he was 2/3 god and 1/3 mortal, and the man had to die AS a sacrifice for his people. She built a monument to him and said he would return soon. Remember she was his sister, mother and wife! THE QUEEN! remember THE QUEEN!

After his death SHE became pregnant and said it was his spirit that had returned to do the deed. He was killed in the winter of the year, AND then she got pregnant. Nine months latter in December she birthed a baby boy at the winter solstice. She had monuments and images carved of her holding her baby son who she said was the son of his Father NIMROD. People to worship her son as the reincarnate of her son NIMROD in the flesh. SHE was Queen, so the people took the story, hook, line, and sinker. It became tradition.

SO for thousands of years the "Pagan religions" celebrated the winter solstice (December 21) as the RE-birth of the SUN GOD and made images of him in the arms of his mother. In Sumer, in Mesopotamia (Iraq) more than 2000 years BEFORE Christ the fertility cult worshiped TAMMUZ, with his sister, MOTHER, god "ISHTAR", in the spring. They said his semen (seed) was the raising sap in the trees in spring, bringing new life to the trees.

IF you don't believe me then go yourself and look up topics and names in the Encyclopedia.

Many books have been written telling this same story, SO your ignorance doesn't make it untrue! Go READ YOURSELF!

Our little Library here in Parowan, a town of two thousand people, has a dozen books on Mythology, AND the different names the ancient peoples called them in their various lands.

IN Babylon: NIMROD was called TAMMUZ, Semiramis was ISHTAR.

(ISHTAR is the root word for EASTAR, or as we say Easter.)

IN Egypt: Osiris and Isis, his sister and wife.

IN Greece: ZEUS and Hera, his sister and wife. 
OR, HELIOS and Astarte. 
(another derivative of Easter, Ishtar, the goddess.)

IN Troy: Zeus and Electra, sister and wife.

IN Rome: Jupiter and Juno, sister and wife. 
OR, SOL and Mani the SUN and moon.

IN China: Yang and Yin, Yang the SUN, fire, and Yin the moon and water. The moon controls the tides, and fire of man is quenched, as he goes into woman, the water (seas=people).

All ancient stories came from the same origin. Noah had told his sons of the need of man for a savior to redeem mankind. SO the woman Semiramis set herself up as the QUEEN of Heaven! TO BE WORSHIPED as Mother god. Today Millions, say their prayers to the Mother god, just called by another name Mother god, just called by another name. They often stand or kneel and pray to her holding her baby god. Statues and idols and images and pictures, are everywhere
(See Exodus 20:4-5)

The reason throughout history that so many Pagans don't believe the story of Jesus Christ is that they have heard the story before from ancient Egyptian records thousands of years before Christ, as well as Chinese records about two thousand years before Christ. The Devil did a great job of pre-empting what would happen.

(Read of his rebellion and plan in The Pearl of Great Price in Moses 4,
and Abraham 3. And why God rejected him.)

THE "CHRIST" was NOT born in December in the Freezing cold of winter. He was born in the spring when baby lambs are, and Mother Ewes eat new grass and give lots of milk. "JESUS WAS the lamb" of God. See John 1:29 "Behold the Lamb of God."  See my flyer about the birth of Christ : CLICK HERE What time is it?

ISHTAR-EASTER worship is in the spring! The same for thousands of years!        Easter is NOT a commandment OF GOD,   BUT the "Passover" isFOREVER.

See Exodus 12: The Passover "FOREVER"!  That is Forever!

Ezekiel 8:14-18 Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD'S house which was toward the NORTH; and, behold, there sat women weeping for TAMMUZ. ( WEEPING FOR NIMROD, remember!)

15 Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these.

(Have you ever seen a SUNday,"Easter-ISHTAR", service at SUNrise?) 16 And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD'S house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, AND their faces toward the EAST; and they worshipped THE SUN toward the EAST.

17 Then he said unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? Is it a light thing to the house of Judah that they commit the abominations which they commit here? for they have filled the land with violence, and have returned to provoke me to anger: and, lo, they put the branch to their nose.

18 Therefore will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity: and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet will I not hear them.

(The ancients worshiped the SUN AS PAGANS, are you different?     DO you worship on SUNday? See My Nov. 1997 flyer about SUNday worshipCLICK HERE TO see that Liars say the Bible is true.

TIME Magazine December 30, 1991, said:" Among Roman Catholics, the Madonna is recognized not only as the Mother of God BUT ALSO, according to modern Popes, AS THE QUEEN OF THE UNIVERSE, QUEEN OF HEAVEN, Seat of Wisdom AND even the SPOUSE of the Holy Spirit."

I have a coin made 441 years ago in 1556 by Ferdinand, AS holy roman emperor that has Mary holding BABY Jesus.

The August 25, 1997, edition OF NEWSWEEK Magazine titled "THE MEANING OF MARY" told of millions of letters to Pope John Paul II, asking him to make the Virgin Mary "CO-Redemptrix, Mediatrix of ALL Graces AND Advocate FOR the People of God." Those letters came from 157 countries the article said. So who is in control of the nations today? THE ANSWER IS   Santa-SATAN- Tammuz-nimrod-the devil-Lucifer.               (Read 2 Corinthians 4: 3-4 ABOUT SATAN THE god of this world.)

Jeremiah 7:18 The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes TO the QUEEN of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.

Jeremiah 44:17 But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the QUEEN of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto HER, as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem: for then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil.

Jeremiah 44:19 And when we burned incense TO the QUEEN of heaven, and poured out drink offerings unto HER, did we make HER cakes to worship HER, and pour out drink offerings unto HER, without our men?

Jeremiah 44:25 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, saying; Ye and your wives have both spoken with your mouths, and fulfilled with your hand, saying, We will surely perform our vows that we have vowed, to burn incense TO the QUEEN of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto HER: ye will surely accomplish your vows, and surely perform your vows.

Now I realize that your traditions may cause you to reject the words of GOD! You like what you believe now. So keep your traditions and die So keep your traditions and die in this Nuclear War. BUT don't plan on heaven when you keep Christmas and Easter, like the heathen pagans.

As I set this type Nov 16, 1997 I think of my vision in 1988 of the ISHTAR GATE in Babylon, IRAQ, getting hit with a Nuclear Bomb. I have written about it in other flyers in years past. Today Saddam Hussein and the USA are about to war again. The vision last Thursday of a Mushroom cloud over Jerusalem brings the destruction of Babylon to my mind. IN 1988, I saw a mushroom cloud about 50 miles south of Baghdad Iraq, at ancient Babylon. That could be a great cause for the Islamic republics of former USSR. to attack us around Christmas time. They are PART of the sickle to reap the earth of heathen pagans. Jeremiah 10: talks about HEATHENS with Christmas TREES. DO YOU think that you can ignore the words of God, and escape HIS WRATH? SEE Luke 12:10-20 Read Luke 12,13,14 !

In the HIStory of the world few people want to hear from a true Prophet. They want leaders to tell them what they want to hear. Parents, THIS WAR is your fault, to give your children traditions that GOD has spoken of, and said were so wrong. What is your answer when at your Judgment you are asked IF you can read? Why didn't you obey what GOD has said? Every person is alone for their own answer. Others sins are not yours! You answer for your OWN sins!

Do you really PRAY "thy kingdom come thy will be done," OR are you a lying hypocrite? Would your religious leaders tell you the truth, OR JUST LET YOU DIE? headed for hell, SO THAT, you will keep giving them money because they say, what you want to hear. Oh  you are doing great, you are the Lords people.

Galatians 4:8-11,16 Howbeit then, WHEN ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.

9 But now, after that ye have known God, OR rather are known OF GOD HOW turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements, whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage? (AND keep your traditions.)

10 Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years.


16 Am I therefore become your enemy, BECAUSE I tell you the truth?       (DO YOU WANT THE TRUTH? OR to die by traditions?)

No automatic alt text available.

Theology: "Augustine assimilated Roman ideals into Christian theology"

Those who believe in a trinity are saying that Jesus was a Son by DESIGNATION instead of Begotten of the DNA of God:
Watch a video here about this: https://youtu.be/5cdhBkUYV_4?t=952

What is the Trinity Doctrine?
trinity exposed 1+1+1=1 demon worship in the Temple of God

The doctrine of the trinity as taught by most Churches states that there are three co-equal (equal in every respect), co-eternal (the same age), omniscient (all knowing), omnipotent (all powerful) gods, who are not three gods, but one god. By the words of the Athanasian Creed it is, “the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are notthree gods but one God.” The Athanasian Creed (Roman Catholic Creed) says that the one God is three divine personalities in one indivisible substance or essence. It is the one indivisible nature part which is a problem because it is maintained that this constitutes the one God being 1+1+1=One! That is, the Father is God, Jesus is God, the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three gods but one God, and that is the Trinity!

You do not have to be very smart to realise that this makes no sense at all. Therefore, those teaching this doctrine tag it with the word mystery, stating that you will never be able to understand it so just accept it. They may also say, just because it is Catholic it does not mean it is wrong. So in one way or another Satan has tricked people into believing this falsehood without checking it out for themselves. There is in fact not one Scripture in the Bible that literally states the Holy Spirit is God, not one! And there is also not one valid Scripture that says all three are one.

Some Churches differ on some points from orthodoxy, but regarding the basic premise being the one God is three gods in one, it is exactly the same as the Athanasian Creed. This is the creed upon which the Roman Catholic faith is built.

We also find that the word “Trinity” originated from Tertullian around 200 AD who did not even state the immanent trinity as known today, the 3 in 1 god came from Athanasius in 325 AD, and the idea of the Holy Spirit as a third being came from three Cappadocians in 381 AD. Hence the word “Trinity”
"In rejecting the truth, men reject its Author. In trampling upon the law of God, they deny the authority of the Lawgiver. It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stone. By misrepresenting the attributes of God, Satan leads men to conceive of him in a false character. With many, a philosophical idol is enthroned in the place of Jehovah; while the living God, as he is revealed in his Word, in Christ, and in the works of creation, is worshiped by but few. Thousands deify nature, while they deny the God of nature. Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah. The god of many professedly wise men, of philosophers, poets, politicians, journalists,—the god of polished fashionable circles, of many colleges and universities, even of some theological institutions,—is little better than Baal, the sun-god of Phenicia." The Great Controversy 1888, p. 583.1 (Ellen G. White)
and this doctrine cannot be found anywhere in the Scriptures. It was patched together by Catholic theologians hundreds of years after the death of the apostles and long after the completion of the Bible. Instead, Trinitarianism comes from the allegorical ideas of the Alexandrines and is a mixture of Greek and Roman philosophies that are loosely based on a handful of Bible verses snatched out of context or interpolated into the text.

"Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah" The Great Controversy 1888, p. 583.1 (Ellen G. White).

From the very beginning of the great controversy in Heaven, it has been Satan's purpose to overthrow the law of God. It was to accomplish this that he entered upon his rebellion against the Creator; and though he was cast out of Heaven, he has continued the same warfare upon the earth. To deceive men, and thus lead them to transgress God's law, is the object which he has steadfastly pursued. Whether this be accomplished by casting aside the law altogether, or by rejecting one of its precepts, the result will be ultimately the same. He that offends “in one point,” manifests contempt for the whole law; his influence and example are on the side of transgression; he becomes “guilty of all.” [James 2:10.]

In seeking to cast contempt upon the divine statutes, Satan has perverted the doctrines of the Bible, and errors have thus become incorporated into the faith of thousands who profess to believe the Scriptures. The last great conflict between truth and error is but the final struggle of the long-standing controversy concerning the law of God. Upon this battle we are now entering,—a battle between the laws of men and the precepts of Jehovah, between the religion of the Bible and the religion of fable and tradition.

The agencies which will unite against truth and righteousness in this contest are now actively at work. God's holy Word, which has been handed down to us at such a cost of suffering and blood, is but little valued. The Bible is within the reach of all, but there are few who really accept it as the guide of life. Infidelity prevails to an alarming extent, not in the world merely, but in the church. Many have come to deny doctrines which are the very pillars of the Christian faith. The great facts of creation as presented by the inspired writers, the fall of man, the atonement, and the perpetuity of the law of God, are practically rejected, either wholly or in part, by a large share of the professedly Christian world. Thousands who pride themselves upon their wisdom and independence regard it an evidence of weakness to place implicit confidence in the Bible; they think it a proof of superior talent and learning to cavil at the Scriptures, and to spiritualize and explain away their most important truths. Many ministers are teaching their people, and many professors and teachers are instructing their students, that the law of God has been changed or abrogated; and those who regard its requirements as still valid, to be literally obeyed, are thought to be deserving only of ridicule or contempt.

In rejecting the truth, men reject its Author. In trampling upon the law of God, they deny the authority of the Lawgiver. It is as easy to make an idol of false doctrines and theories as to fashion an idol of wood or stoneBy misrepresenting the attributes of God, Satan leads men to conceive of him in a false character. With many, a philosophical idol is enthroned in the place of Jehovah; while the living God, as he is revealed in his Word, in Christ, and in the works of creation, is worshiped by but few. Thousands deify nature, while they deny the God of nature. Though in a different form, idolatry exists in the Christian world today as verily as it existed among ancient Israel in the days of Elijah. The god of many professedly wise men, of philosophers, poets, politicians, journalists,—the god of polished fashionable circles, of many colleges and universities, even of some theological institutions,—is little better than Baal, the sun-god of Phenicia. 

“To the law and to the testimony. If they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” [Isaiah 8:20.] The people of God are directed to the Scriptures as their safeguard against the influence of false teachers and the delusive power of spirits of darkness. Satan employs every possible device to prevent men from obtaining a knowledge of the Bible; for its plain utterances reveal his deceptions. At every revival of God's work, the prince of evil is aroused to more intense activity; he is now putting forth his utmost efforts for a final struggle against Christ and his followers. The last great delusion is soon to open before us. Antichrist is to perform his marvelous works in our sight. So closely will the counterfeit resemble the true, that it will be impossible to distinguish between them except by the Holy Scriptures. By their testimony every statement and every miracle must be tested.

Those who endeavor to obey all the commandments of God will be opposed and derided. They can stand only in God. In order to endure the trial before them, they must understand the will of God as revealed in his Word; they can honor him only as they have a right conception of his character, government, and purposes, and act in accordance with them. None but those who have fortified the mind with the truths of the Bible will stand through the last great conflict. To every soul will come the searching test, Shall I obey God rather than men? The decisive hour is even now at hand. Are our feet planted on the rock of God's immutable Word? Are we prepared to stand firm in defense of the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus?The Great Controversy 1888, p. 583.1 (Ellen G. White).

Thus the Trinity is a man made doctrine that borrows heavily from paganism and Greek philosophy and was developed long after the Scriptures were completed. Therefore, this doctrine could never have come from Scripture anyway and has to be taught alongside the Bible. And so if you had never heard of it, you would never come up with it yourself from just reading the Bible alone. As a result, you will also find that eisegesis has to be used to convince others of this doctrine.

It was after God confused the languages at Babel that the sun began to be worshipped in three stages as three gods. That is, the rising sun was god, the midday sun was god, the setting sun was god, and yet there were not three gods but one god! In other words, 1+1+1=One! This is the absolute origin of the three in one trinity doctrine. Knowing who we worship is the key to eternal life, so if God was truly a trinity, you can be sure there would be unmistakable Scriptures saying so, but there is none.

Thus the Doctrine of the Trinity, or Tritheism is a heresy that proceeds from Romanism and tantamount to Sunday Worship. An Abomination before God. It is a doctrine that emanates straight from the dunghill of Roman decretals. It is philosophy, vain deceit and man's tradition. It denies Jesus, preaches another Jesus, another spirit and another Gospel.

Colossians 2:8-10 “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. And you are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:”

2 Corinthians 11:3-4, 13-14 “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if you receive another spirit, which you have not received, or another gospel, which you have not accepted, you might well bear with him. 13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. 14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”

2 Peter 2:1-2 “But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.”

What does the Bible Teach?

There is no mystery with the Biblical view of the Godhead which reveals there is but one true God the Father who is a literal Father, one Lord Jesus Christ being His literal Son, and one Holy Spirit being the presence and power of God and not a separate being with a separate consciousness.

As one Christian author wrote. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, not a son by creation as were the angels, nor a son by adoption as is the forgiven sinner, but a Son begotten in the express image of the Father's person that is equal in authority and divine perfection.

Below Paul lists seven distinct things showing that they are all separate and that one is not the other. Hence the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three separate and distinct entities of which one is not and cannot be the other. Parentheses are added.

“There is one body, and one Spirit [Holy Spirit], even as you are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord [Jesus Christ], one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.” Ephesians 4:4-6

Is the Trinity Doctrine in the Bible?

Many people assume that God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit form what is commonly known as the trinity. The doctrine of the trinity is usually summed up as a belief in one God existing in three distinct but equal persons. But did you realize that even though it is a common assumption among many sincere Christian people, the word TRINITY does not appear anywhere in the Bible?

In fact, the word TRINITY did not come into common use as a religious term until CENTURIES AFTER the last books of the Bible were completed and long after the apostles of Christ were gone from the scene! Could the trinity doctrine have pagan origins?

Notice this admission in the New Bible Dictionary, “The term trinity is not itself found in the Bible. It was first used by Tertullian at the close of the 2nd century, but received wide currency [common use in intellectual discussion] and formal elucidation [clarification] only in the 4th and 5th centuries.” — (1996, “Trinity”)

The New Bible Dictionary goes on to explain that “the formal doctrine of the Trinity was the result of several inadequate attempts to explain who and what the Christian God really is ... To deal with these problems the Church Fathers met in [A.D.] 325 at the Council of Nicaea to set out an orthodox biblical definition concerning the divine identity.” However, it wasn't until 381, “at the Council of Constantinople, [that] the divinity of the Spirit was affirmed.”

While Tertullian introduced the term “trinity,” what he taught and believed is different to what the trinity doctrine is today. And since he introduced this term, than that means the trinity doctrine as taught today did not exist in the time of Tertullian. And if it did not exist in his time, then it could never have existed in the time of Christ and the apostles.

Tertullian however did introduce pagan ideas into the worship service. He taught oblations for the dead and made the sign of the cross on the forehead of worshipers. He also dipped people three times to baptize them. Tertullian freely admitted that he had adopted these ideas from pagan teachings and could not support them from Scripture, but he thought that if Christians adopted some heathen rituals of the pagans that they would find it easier to join Christianity.

Wikipedia states what Tertullian believed on the Godhead:

Tertullian was just a forerunner of the Nicene doctrine and did not state the immanent trinity. His use of trinitas (Latin: 'Threeness') emphasised the manifold character of God. In his treatise against Praxeas he used the words, “Trinity and economy, persons and substance.” The Son is distinct from the Father, and the Spirit from both the Father and the Son. “These three are one substance, not one person; and it is said, 'I and my Father are one' in respect not of the singularity of number but the unity of the substance.”

In his book Tertullian against Praxeas, he also states that the Son was not co-eternal with the Father and did have a beginning as the begotten Son of God. He also did not teach that the Holy Spirit was a literal being.

So the trinity doctrine as we know it today did not even come from the man who introduced the word Trinity.

So the doctrine of the trinity wasn't formalized until long after the Bible was completed and the apostles were long dead in their graves, and long after the man who introduced the word Trinity was dead and in his grave. It took later theologians centuries to sort out what they believed and to formulate the belief in the trinity!

By no means are theologians' explanations of the trinity doctrine clear. Religious writer A.W. Tozer in his book The Knowledge of the Holy states that the trinity is an “incomprehensible mystery” and that attempts to understand it “must remain forever futile.” He admits that Churches, “without pretending to understand,” have nevertheless continued to teach this doctrine (1961, pp. 17, 18) He then remarkably concludes, “The fact that it cannot be satisfactorily explained, instead of being against it, is in its favor.” — (p. 23)

The New Unger's Bible Dictionary in its article on the trinity concedes that the Trinitarian concept is humanly incomprehensible, “It is admitted by all who thoughtfully deal with this subject that the Scripture revelation here leads us into the presence of a deep mystery; and that all human attempts at expression are of necessity imperfect.” — (1988, p. 1308)

Cyril Richardson, professor of Church history at New York's Union Theological Seminary, though a dedicated Trinitarian himself said this in his book The Doctrine of The Trinity, “My conclusion, then, about the doctrine of the Trinity is that it is an artificial construct ... It produces confusion rather than clarification; and while the problems with which it deals are real ones, the solutions it offers are not illuminating. It has posed for many Christians dark and mysterious statements, which are ultimately meaningless, because it does not sufficiently discriminate in its use of terms.” — (1958, pp. 148-149)

He also admitted, “Much of the defense of the Trinity as a 'revealed' doctrine, is really an evasion of the objections that can be brought against it.” — (p. 16)

A Dictionary of Religious Knowledge states regarding the trinity, “Precisely what that doctrine is, or rather precisely how it is to be explained, Trinitarians are not agreed among themselves.” — (Lyman Abbott, editor, 1885, “Trinitarians”)

Why do even those who believe in the trinity doctrine find it so difficult to explain?

The answer is simple yet shocking. It is because the Bible does not teach it! One cannot prove or explain something from the Bible that is not Biblical. The Bible is our only reliable source of divine revelation. And the truth as we will see is that the trinity concept simply is not part of God's revelation to mankind.

These following admissions from a number of reputable sources and authors who, while themselves affirming the Trinity, acknowledge that the word Trinity and the doctrine is not found in the Bible.

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia acknowledges that “'trinity' is a second-century term found nowhere in the Bible, and the Scriptures present no finished trinitarian statement.” — (1988, Vol. 4, “Trinity,” p. 914). It further states that “church fathers crystallized the doctrine in succeeding centuries”—long after the apostles had passed from the scene.

Martin Luther who was the German priest who initiated the Protestant Reformation said, “It is indeed true that the name 'Trinity' is nowhere to be found in the Holy Scriptures, but has been conceived and invented by man.” — (reproduced in The Sermons of Martin Luther, John Lenker, editor, Vol. 3, 1988, p. 406)

Historian and science fiction writer H.G. Wells in his noted work The Outline of History stated, “There is no evidence that the apostles of Jesus ever heard of the trinity—at any rate from him.” — (1920, Vol. 2, p. 499)

The HarperCollins Encyclopedia of Catholicism says, “Today, however, scholars generally agree that there is no doctrine of the Trinity as such in either the OT or the NT ... It would go far beyond the intention and thought-forms of the OT to suppose that a late-fourth-century or thirteenth-century Christian doctrine can be found there ... Likewise, the NT does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity.” — (Richard McBrien, general editor, 1995, “God,” pp. 564, 565)

And the HarperCollins Bible Dictionary states, “The formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the NT.” — (Paul Achtemeier, editor, 1996, “Trinity”)

Professor Charles Ryrie wrote, “Many doctrines are accepted by evangelicals as being clearly taught in the Scripture for which there are no proof texts. The doctrine of the Trinity furnishes the best example of this. It is fair to say that the Bible does not clearly teach the doctrine of the Trinity . . . In fact, there is not even one proof text, if by proof text we mean a verse or passage that 'clearly' states that there is one God who exists in three persons.” — (Basic Theology, p. 89)

He goes on to say, “The above illustrations prove the fallacy of concluding that if something is not proof texted in the Bible we cannot clearly teach the results . . . If that were so, I could never teach the doctrine of the Trinity.” — (lbid, p. 90)

Shirley Guthrie, professor of theology at Columbia Theological Seminary wrote, “The Bible does not teach the doctrine of the Trinity. Neither the word 'trinity' itself nor such language as 'one-in-three,' 'three-in-one,' one 'essence' (or 'substance'), and three 'persons,' is biblical language. The language of the doctrine is the language of the ancient church taken from classical Greek philosophy.” — (Christian Doctrine, 1994, pp. 76, 77)

Millard Erickson who is a research professor of theology at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary writes that the Trinity “is not clearly or explicitly taught anywhere in Scripture, yet it is widely regarded as a central doctrine, indispensable to the Christian faith. In this regard, it goes contrary to what is virtually an axiom of biblical doctrine, namely, that there is a direct correlation between the scriptural clarity of a doctrine and its cruciality to the faith and life of the church.
In view of the difficulty of the subject and the great amount of effort expended to maintain this doctrine, we may well ask ourselves what might justify all this trouble.” — (God in Three Persons: A Contemporary Interpretation of the Trinity, p. 12)

He further states that the Trinity teaching “is not present in biblical thought, but arose when biblical thought was pressed into this foreign mold [of Greek concepts]. Thus, the doctrine of the Trinity goes beyond and even distorts what the Bible says about God.” — (lbid, p. 20)

He also stated, “It is claimed that the doctrine of the Trinity is a very important, crucial, and even basic doctrine. If that is indeed the case, should it not be somewhere more clearly, directly, and explicitly stated in the Bible? If this is the doctrine that especially constitutes Christianity's uniqueness ... how can it be only implied in the biblical revelation? ... For here is a seemingly crucial matter where the Scriptures do not speak loudly and clearly.

Little direct response can be made to this charge. It is unlikely that any text of Scripture can be shown to teach the doctrine of the Trinity in a clear, direct, and unmistakable fashion.” — (lbid, pp. 108, 109)

Since the trinity is not found in the Bible as so many scholars and theologians admit, then how did it come to be viewed as such an important teaching? Theology professors Roger Olson and Christopher Hall explain part of the puzzle in their book The Trinity, “It is understandable that the importance placed on this doctrine is perplexing to many lay Christians and students. Nowhere is it clearly and unequivocally stated in Scripture ... How can it be so important if it is not explicitly stated in Scripture? ...
The doctrine of the Trinity developed gradually after the completion of the New Testament in the heat of controversy, but the church fathers who developed it believed they were simply exegeting [explaining] divine revelation and not at all speculating or inventing new ideas. The full-blown doctrine of the Trinity was spelled out in the fourth century at two great ecumenical (universal) councils: Nicea (325 A.D.) and Constantinople (381 A.D.).” — (2002, pp. 1, 2)

We see from this and other sources quoted above that the idea of a trinity was foreign to Biblical writers. Instead, as many of these sources openly acknowledge, the doctrine of the trinity developed considerably later and over a span of several centuries. To understand the factors that led to the introduction of this belief, we must first go way back to Babel.

Read more at trinitytruth dot org

Most Have No Idea what the Trinity Doctrine is

The majority of professed Trinitarians have absolutely no idea what the Trinity doctrine actually is. And when some find out, they are so shocked that they go into denial and say, “That is not what I believe!”

If you do not believe the facts stated below, then you are NOT a Trinitarian! And if what you follow differs from what is explained below, then it is NOT the Trinity doctrine! It does not matter whether it be the SDA Church or any other Church. There is only ONE Trinity doctrine and it does not come in different flavours.

The Trinity doctrine says there are THREE LITERAL GODS that are equal in every way and that all THREE gods have always existed. THREE gods that are co-equal and co-eternal in other words.

But now we have a SERIOUS problem because the Bible says there is only ONE God.

SATAN via the Catholic Church says NO PROBLEM…I have just the answer to keep all deceived. We will teach that all THREE GODS are really only ONE GOD!

1 + 1 + 1 = 1 !

THREE LITERAL GODS that are not really 3 GODS but 1 GOD. Make sense? No! Why should it? It was made up by Satan via the Catholic Church so Satan could get worship and have Christians deny the Father and Son and not even know it !

Satan HATES the SON OF GOD and wants us to deny Him. Not only that, but we can only be saved by confessing that Jesus is the Son of God. So how does the Trinity doctrine deny the Father and Son and give worship to Satan?

If they are 3 gods that have ALWAYS existed, Jesus cannot really be a SON and therefore God cannot really be a FATHER.

And so the Bible now has hundreds of lies! More unmistakable Scriptures are denied then any other doctrine EVER ! And yet people just go on blindly believing that it is right. Like lambs to the slaughter as they say.

So God is not the Father of Christ and Christ is not the Son of God says the Trinity doctrine!

Every Scripture that says Jesus is the Son of God is now a lie. Every Scripture that says God is the Father is now a lie. How many Scriptures suddenly become a lie?....“HUNDREDS!”

The Bible says Jesus was God’s Son before He came to Earth. The Trinity doctrine says No!
The Bible says Jesus is the Son of God. The Trinity doctrine says No! He is just ROLE PLAYING.
The Bible says God is the Father of Christ. The Trinity doctrine says No! He is just ROLE PLAYING.

Where is there ONE Scripture that even hints they are not really a Father and Son and that they are ROLE PLAYING?


The Bible says the Holy Spirit is the “Spirit OF God” or the “Spirit OF the Father.” The Trinity doctrine says No! It claims it is something called “god the spirit” which has a different meaning and does NOT exist in Scripture but came from antichrist !

So instead of the Holy Spirit being the SPIRIT OF THE FATHER, it is now some third god called “god the spirit.”

And if “god the spirit” is Satan’s idea and his creation…what spirit do you have in you? And what spirit do you give your adoration to? And what spirit do you worship or pray to for those who are now doing that also?

It will be SATAN !

Christians need to wake up before it is too late.

The extract below is from a mainstream SDA book. Adventist Woodrow Whidden says that expressions such as “Father,” “Son,” “Firstborn,” “Only Begotten,” “Begotten,” “the only true God” and “one God the Father” are just figurative and metaphorical. Now where is there even a hint in Scripture that this is so?

“Is it not quite apparent that the problem texts become problems only when one assumes an exclusively literalistic interpretation of such expressions as “Father,” “Son,” “Firstborn,” “Only Begotten,” “Begotten,” and so forth? Does not such literalism go against the mainly figurative or metaphorical meaning that the Bible writers use when referring to the persons of the Godhead? Can one really say that the Bible writers meant such expressions as “the only true God” and “one God the Father”…” — (Woodrow Whidden, The Trinity, p. 106, 2002)

A metaphor did not send a metaphor to save us. A Father sent us His Son to save us. (John 3:16)

Is the Holy Spirit a Third Being or the Spirit of Christ?

The Trinity doctrine claims the Holy Spirit is a third being, while SOP teaches that the Holy Spirit is the mind, power and personal presence of the very life of God that the Father sends through His Son to us. Or to put it another way to make sure this is clear. The Holy Spirit is the presence and power of the Father manifested through Jesus Christ His only begotten son. And hence Ellen Whites states many times that the “The HOLY SPIRIT is the SPIRIT of CHRIST,” — (E.G. White, 14MR, p. 84)

With this in mind, answer each of the following and you will have the correct answer to this question many times over.


We know the Comforter is the Holy Spirit. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“This refers to the omnipresence of the SPIRIT OF CHRIST, called the COMFORTER.” — (E.G. White, 14MR 179.2)

“As by faith we look to Jesus, our faith pierces the shadow, and we adore God for His wondrous love in giving JESUS THE COMFORTER.” — (E.G. White, 19MR 297.3)


We know the SPIRIT OF TRUTH is the Holy Spirit. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“JESUS comes to you as the SPIRIT OF TRUTH;” — (E.G. White, 2MR 337.1)

“We cannot be with CHRIST in person, as were His first disciples, but He has sent HIS HOLY SPIRIT to GUIDE US INTO ALL TRUTH, and through this power we too can bear witness for the Saviour. [John 16:13 quoted]” — (E.G. White, Ms30, June 18, 1900)


We know the Holy Spirit is sent to REPRESENT Christ. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“CHRIST has left HIS HOLY SPIRIT to be HIS REPRESENTATIVE in the world,” — (E.G. White, Lt84, October 22, 1895)

“The Holy Spirit is the SPIRIT OF CHRIST; it is HIS REPRESENTATIVE.” — (E.G. White, 13MR 313.3, 1895)


We know the Holy Spirit was breathed on the disciples. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it was the Spirit of Christ?

“He [Christ] breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost: ... Before the disciples could fulfill their official duties in connection with the church, CHRIST breathed HIS SPIRIT upon them.” — (E.G. White, DOA, p. 805)


We know the Holy Spirit was given at Pentecost. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it was the Spirit of Christ?

“CHRIST declared that the divine influence of HIS SPIRIT was to be with His followers UNTO THE END. From the DAY OF PENTECOST to the present time, the COMFORTER has been sent to all who have yielded themselves fully to the Lord and to His service.” — (E.G. White, AA, 49.2)


We know SOP calls the Holy Spirit a person. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“Remember the words of CHRIST, remember that HE is an unseen presence in the PERSON of the Holy Spirit,” — (E.G. White, DG 185.2, 1897)


We know the Holy Spirit is the third person. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“They have ONE God and ONE Saviour; and ONE Spirit--the Spirit of Christ--” — (E.G. White, 9T 189.3, 1909)

“We want the HOLY SPIRIT, which is JESUS CHRIST.” — (E.G. White, Lt66, April 10, 1894)


We know SOP says “SIN could be resisted and overcome ONLY through the mighty agency of the THIRD PERSON of the Godhead,” — (E.G. White, DOA, 671.2). So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“There is no power in you apart from CHRIST, but it is your privilege to have Christ abiding in your heart by faith, and HE can OVERCOME SIN in you, when you cooperate with His efforts.” — (E.G. White, OHC, 76.5)

“With HIS SPIRIT CHRIST sends a reconciling influence and a power that TAKES AWAY SIN.” — (E.G. White, RH, May 19, 1904)


We know SOP calls the Holy Spirit a POWER. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“CHRIST has given HIS SPIRIT as a divine POWER.” — (E.G. White, RH, November 19, 1908)


We are told not to GRIEVE the Holy Spirit. So which lines up with SOP? A third being or the SOP which says it is the Spirit of Christ?

“O, how we GRIEVE the pure, HOLY SPIRIT OF CHRIST with our defiling sins!” — (E.G. White, RH, July 5, 1898)


The trinity doctrine claims the Holy Spirit a third co-equal being. So which lines up with SOP? The Father and Son and a third being or the SOP which says it is ONLY the Father and Son?

“The Father and the Son ALONE are to be exalted.” — (E.G. White, YI, July 7, 1898)

“God and Christ ALONE know what the souls of men have cost.” — (E.G. White, ST, January 13, 1909)
“The ONLY Being who was one with God lived the law in humanity, descended to the lowly life of a common laborer, and toiled at the carpenter's bench with His earthly parent.” — (E.G. White, ST, October 14, 1897)

So Ellen White was 100% consistent in all that she wrote. She wrote, “The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Christ,” — (14MR 84.3) and so she also wrote that:

The Comforter is the SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
the Spirit of truth is the SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
the third person is the SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
the third great power is the SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
the Holy Spirit given at Pentecost was the SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
the Holy Spirit Jesus breathed on His disciples was HIS own SPIRIT,
the Holy Spirit Christ sent to represent Himself was HIS own SPIRIT,
the heavenly dignitaries are the Father, Son and SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
the Heavenly trio is the Father, Son and SPIRIT OF CHRIST,
and she reveals over and over again that there are only two beings in the Godhead.

So we find it is impossible for the Holy Spirit to be a third being. SOP identifies two beings ALONE and constantly reveals the Holy Spirit is the Spirit of Christ in every way. Why the confusion? Because most have failed to notice that Ellen White called the Spirit of Christ a person and was not referring to a literal person.

Could you ever miss who is being spoken about here?
Lift up CHRIST in His power in the PERSON of the Holy Spirit. He is waiting for them to open the door and admit Him.” — (Ellen G. White, Lt59, March 29, 1899).

The Holy Spirit is the comforter, your comforter…Which is always ready to help our infirmities. He is always waiting at your door, always knocking for admittance. Let Him in” (TDG158)

“Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.”(Revelation 3: 20)

The Satanic doctrine of the Trinity now in the SDA Church!

The General Conference of Seventh Day Adventist organization and people, many unknowingly, as members of the modern SDA church have rejected the old Landmarks of the early SDA pioneers and have wandered after other gods just like the Jews did - worshiping Astoreth and other false Gods

Here is a table showing the differences of the truth God gave His remnant Church which were non-Trinitarian and the introduction of the word Trinity in the first Fundamental Beliefs in 1931, which was NOT even officially voted on until 1980.

This was done 16 years AFTER the death of Ellen White and after all the original pioneers were dead.

Ellen White wrote:

“And now, after half a century of clear light from the Word as to what is truth, there are arising many false theories, to unsettle minds. But the evidence given in our early experience has the same force that it had then. The truth is the same as it ever has been, and not a pin or a pillar can be moved from the structure of truth. That which was sought for out of the Word in 1844, 1845, and 1846 remains the truth today in every particular.” — (E.G. White, Letter 38, 1906)

It was in this three year period that the pillars of faith were established.

So more than 11 years after she supposedly became a Trinitarian, she states that the truths established in these first three years remained the same in every way still in 1906.

So why was it now possible in 1930 to write a new Fundamental Statement of Beliefs?

1.Uriah Smith became silent when he died in 1903.

2.Daniel Bordeau became silent at his death in 1905.

3.Ellen G. White became silent at her death in 1915.

4.Ellet J. Waggoner and Dr. David Paulson became silent when they died the following year in 1916.

5.Stephen N. Haskell became silent at his death in 1922.

6.Alonzo T. Jones became silent at his death in 1923.

7.John Norton Loughborough became silent at his death in 1924.

By the end of the 1930's the last remaining “old guard” pioneers had died and a new generation of Adventist leaders was coming into prominence. The timing was possible for the change in 1930 because certain individuals would not be able to sound an alarm. Their voices were now silent.

Their writings could still speak but this would not be as effectual as a live pioneer speaking in protest to the changes that began in 1926.

For many years the writings of pioneer Adventists were eliminated from the shelves of Adventist Book Centers. The writings of E.J. Waggoner and A.T. Jones had been virtually impossible to find until recent years. “Leaves Of Autumn Books” and other independent ministries are responsible for the restoration of pioneer Adventist writings being restored including to Adventist Book Centers.

In 1980, the General Conference voted on a new set of “27 Fundamental Beliefs” in which the trinity doctrine was upheld. Fundamental belief number 2 now read, “2. The Trinity. There is one God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, a unity of three co-eternal Persons.” (Emphasis).

The concept delineated here is that there are “three co-eternal Persons” and this part is in complete harmony with the Catholic Church's pagan teaching regarding the trinity.

In 1981, SDA General Conference President, Neal C. Wilson, announced to the General Conference meeting in Dallas, Texas, that the Church had officially adopted the trinity doctrine, which was now number 2 in the Church's “27 Fundamental Beliefs.” Wilson said, “There is another universal and truly catholic organization, the Seventh-day Adventist Church,” — (Adventist Review, March 5, 1981, p. 3)

I for one cannot disagree with his statement. As far as the three-in-one part of the trinity doctrine goes that says, the Father is God, Jesus is God, the Holy Spirit is God, and yet there are not three gods but one God, they are now on par with the Catholic Church just as the Papacy and Satan had no doubt planned.

Is the Trinity doctrine in the SDA Church the same as the Catholic Church?

J.S. Washburn (1863-1955) was a retired Adventist minister and he and his wife were dear friends of Ellen and James White. He cites his interview with Ellen White at Ottawa, Kansas as being the turning point of his life.

He was converted through J.N. Andrews at age 11, Baptized by James White at 12 and began preaching Adventism at age 21.

Washburn knew his Bible very well in more ways than one. By 1918 he could recite Revelation, Romans, James and 2 Peter. By 1948 he had memorized the entire New Testament and was starting on Isaiah!

When one person begun to try and bring the Trinity doctrine into the SDA Church, J.S. Washburn was one of our brilliant pioneers that tried to stop it.

Note that this is the Trinity doctrine from the Catholic Church that was being brought in. This is a fact that the deceived try and hide from us today. It is time to wake up!

In 1939, Judson S. Washburn wrote an objection letter to the Conference. A sermon delivered by W.W. Prescott that year inspired him to send a lengthy letter denouncing the invasion of the Trinitarian doctrine into the Adventist Church.

Noting that “The doctrine of the Trinity is regarded as the supreme test of orthodoxy by the Roman Catholic Church,” he proceeded to state why it should be rejected. “Satan has taken some heathen conception of a three-headed monstrosity, and with deliberate intention to cast contempt upon divinity, has woven it into Romanism as our glorious God, an impossible, absurd invention. This monstrous doctrine transplanted from heathenism into the Roman Papal Church is seeking to intrude its evil presence into the teachings of the Third Angel's Message...”

Washburn goes on to say, “If we should go back to the immortality of the soul, purgatory, eternal torment and the Sunday Sabbath, would that be anything less than apostasy? If, however, we leap over all these minor, secondary doctrines and accept and teach the very central root, doctrine of Romanism, the Trinity, and teach that the son of God did not die, even though our words seem to be spiritual, is this anything else or anything less than apostasy, and the very Omega of apostasy?”

Mr. Washburn continues with words that every Adventist should carefully heed,

“However kindly or beautiful or apparently profound his sermons or articles may be, when a man has arrived at the place where he teaches the heathen Catholic doctrine of the Trinity, and denies that the Son of God died for us, is he a true Seventh-day Adventist? Is he even a true preacher of the Gospel?” — (The above are portions of a letter written by J.S. Washburn in 1939.

This letter was liked by a conference president so much that he distributed it to 32 of his ministers)

Here is the SDA President declaring the Catholic trinity doctrine. There can be no doubt! There is only ONE Trinity doctrine in any case. So many lies we are told.

“The doctrine of the Trinity is a cruel heathen monstrosity, removing Jesus from his true position of Divine Savior and Mediator. It is true we can not measure or define divinity. It is beyond our finite understanding, yet on this subject of the personality of God the Bible is very simple and plainThe Father, the Ancient of Days, is from eternity. Jesus was begotten of the Father. Jesus speaking through the Psalmist says: “The Lord (Jehovah) has said unto me, Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee.” - Psalm 2:7.

Again in Proverbs (where Jesus is spoken of under the title of wisdom, See 1 Cor. 1:24), we read: “The Lord (Jehovah) possessed me in the beginning of his way”. - v. 22

“Before the mountains were settled, before the hills was I brought forth.” - v. 24

The Son says he was brought forth, begotten, born of His Father (Jehovah). …

Satan has taken some heathen conception of a three-headed monstrosity, and with deliberate intention to cast contempt upon divinity, has woven it into Romanism as our glorious God, an impossible, absurd invention. This monstrous doctrine transplanted from heathenism into the Roman Papal Church is seeking to intrude its evil presence into the teachings of the Third Angel’s Message. …

And the fact that Christ is not the mediator in the Roman Church demonstrates that the Trinity destroys the truth that Christ is the one, the only mediator. The so-called Christian Church, the Papacy, that originated the doctrine of the Trinity, does not recognize him as the only mediator but substitutes a multitude of ghosts of dead men and women as mediators. If you hold the Trinity doctrine, in reality, Christ is no longer your mediator. …

Seventh-day Adventists claim to take the word of God as supreme authority and to have “come out of Babylon”, to have renounced forever the vain traditions of Rome. If we should go back to the immortality of the soul, purgatory, eternal torment and the Sunday Sabbath, would that be anything less than apostasy? If, however, we leap over all these minor, secondary doctrines and accept and teach the very central root, doctrine of Romanism, the Trinity, and teach that the son of God did not die, even though our words seem to be spiritual, is this anything else or anything less than apostasy, and the very Omega of apostasy?…

However kindly or beautiful or apparently profound his sermons or articles may be, when a man has arrived at the place where he teaches the heathen Catholic doctrine of the Trinity,and denies that the Son of God died for us, is he a true Seventh-day Adventist? Is he even a true preacher of the Gospel? And when many regard him as a great teacher and accept his unscriptural theories, absolutely contrary to the Spirit of Prophecy, it is time that the watchmen should sound a note of warning. … [Portions of a letter written by J. S. Washburn in 1939. This letter was liked by a conference president so much that he distributed it to 32 of his ministers.]

Trinity Truth - Ted Wilson Stating the Catholic Trinity = Ted Wilson says the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are 3 gods that are a 3 in 1 god. This is the Catholic Trinity. The phrases “god the son” and “god the holy spirit” are phrases that do NOT exist in Scripture and have different meanings. These phrases originated from the RCC, not the Bible.

How The Trinity Got Into The Seventh Day Adventist Church

  • Holy Bible found in Jude 1:4  For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
  • Ellen White: "He [Enoch] also saw the corrupt state of the world when Christ should appear the second time--that there would be a boastful, presumptuous, self-willed generation,denying the only God and the Lord Jesus Christ, trampling upon the law, and despising the atonement. He saw the righteous crowned with glory and honor, and the wicked banished from the presence of the Lord, and destroyed by fire."http://www.whiteestate.org/books/pp/pp6.html
  • James White: The way spiritualizers have disposed of or denied the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ is first using the old unscriptural Trinitarian creed(James White, January 24, 1846,The Day Star)
  • James White: “The inexplicable Trinity that makes the Godhead three in one and one in three, is bad enough; but that ultra Unitarianism that makes Christ inferior to the Father is worse. Did God say to an inferior, “Let us make man in our image?”...." The question of the state of the dead is not a practical subject. And yet we discuss it in order to warn the people against spiritualism. The question of the trinity and the unity is not  practical, and yet we call attention to it to guard the people against that terrible heresy that takes from our all-conquering Redeemer his divine power." (James White, Review and Herald November 29th article ‘Christ Equal with God’ 1877)http://www.adventistarchives.org/docs/RH/RH18771129-V50-22__B.pdf#view=fit
  • Judson Washburn: “The doctrine of the Trinity is a cruel heathen monstrosity, removing Jesus from his true position of Divine Savior and Mediator.” (Judson Washburn, letter to SDA General Conference 1940)
Image result for trinity gods"The message of the fall of Babylon, as given by the second angel, is repeated, with the additional mention of the corruption's which have been entering the churches since 1844. The work of this [4th] angel comes in at the right time to join in the last great work of the third angel's message as it swells to a loud cry" Spiritual Gifts Vol. 1, p. 277. 

"This message seemed to be an addition to the third message, Image result for trinity godsand joined it, as the midnight cry joined the second angel’s message in 1844" Spiritual Gifts, vol. 1, p. 193.2  "The message of the fall of Babylon, as given by the second angel (Rev. 14:8), is again given, with the addition of the corruptions which have been entering the (General Conference of Seventh day Adventist = SDA) churches since 1844. The work of this angel comes in at the right time, and joins in the last great work of the third angel’s message, as it swells into a loud cry. And the people of God are fitted up every where to stand in the hour of temptation which they are soon to meet. I saw a great light resting upon them, and they united in the message, and fearlessly proclaimed with great power the third angel’s message (Rev. 14:9-12)

The landmarks setup in the beginning of Adventism have NOT changed and will not ever change because truth is truth for eternity. As you polish truth it only gleams brighter and brighter under investigation or close inspection, any changes that someone may suggest that contradict the old landmarks setup from 1830-1894 is an agent of Satan - bear in mind that ALL of the early SDA Protestant Pioneers did NOT believe in the trinity! The early SDA landmarks, the pillars, the firm foundation, the platform of

eternal truth as setup by the early Protestant Pioneers are NOT BABYLON! Any group or individual who suggests changing the old landmark pillars (doctrines/ideas,same mind, belief and practices, principles) setup in the beginning of Adventism is working for Babylon.


You or any church organization can become a part of Babylon by rejection of the truth setup in the beginning of the Advent movement from 1830-1894 by the early SDA pioneers like James S. WhiteStephen N. HaskellJoseph BatesOtis Nichols and many more. Those who believe, practice and live under the Third Angel's message and keep the 7th day Sabbath ARE a part of the 144,000. Any departure from the 1830-1894 truths setup by the early SDA protestant pioneers is Babylon.

So, when someone tells you "the CHURCH IS NOT BABYLON"! No matter HOW SINFUL she may be "SHE IS NOT BABYLON"! Don't call the "church" Babylon! What they don't tell you is they are misapplying who Babylon is! Babylon IS NOT the OLD LANDMARKS, THE OLD DOCTRINES, THE FIRM FOUNDATIONAL DOCTRINES, THE PLATFORM OF ETERNAL TRUTH that

was setup in the beginning of Adventism! Babylon is anything that REJECTS the old landmarks, the firm foundation, the doctines that were setup in the beginning from 1830-1894! So if the church today has REJECTED any of the OLD LANDMARKS, the old Adventist doctrines as taught by the early faithful, keen, noble and true protestant pioneers = THEY ARE BABYLON! Babylon means they are inbibing the wine of error, the same wine of error as taught by the first beast. So if any group adopts doctrines in common with the first beast, they are riding upon or adopting the same mind, the same ideas as their Mother, the Papacy. See Revelation 17:5 and Ez Like Mother Like daughter....so IF you call yourself an "Adventist" you must be a practicing Adventist who believes like the original early SDA protestant pioneers. A protestant is someone who protests Catholic doctrines. The second beast Rev 13:11 adopts doctrines in common with the Papacy system, so she rides the beast, or adopts doctrines, the same mind, the same ideas as the first beast.

"It does not seem possible to us now that any should have to stand alone, but if God has ever spoken by me, the time will come when we shall be brought before councils and before thousands for His name's sake, and each one will have to give the reason of his faith. Then will come the severest criticism upon every position that has been taken for the truthWe need, then, to study the Word of God, that we may know why we believe the doctrines we advocate"—The Review and Herald, December 18, 1888. LDE 209.1.

"Then in the time of trouble I heard them cry to God in agony--"Why didst thou not show us our wrong, that we might have got right and been ready for this time?Ellen White: Broadside #2 1849/01/31.


Dear Brothers and Sisters: The plain and simple straight testimony TO the Laodiceans is that the modern SDA General Conference Seventh Day Adventist organization has REJECTED the old landmarks, the pillars, the firm foundation, the platform of eternal truth that was setup in the beginning of the Advent movement from 1830-1894. These special points of our faith as once believed and taught by the early SDA protestant pioneers have all been rejected by the Jesuit leaders and those influenced by the Jesuits in the Adventist church today. 

These Jesuits have infiltrated the SDA denomination and have changed our religion from what the early SDA pioneers believed concerning the personality of God and Christ and the Heavenly Sanctuary and the investigative judgement. The Three Angel's Messages (Rev 14:6-12) have been discarded, thrown on the historical "trash heap" per Ted Wilson's Daddy Neal C. Wilson. Our only safety for our soul and the souls of our families and those who we come in contact with are to be covered with the special covering of truth, the old landmarks, the pillars, the firm foundation, the platform of eternal truth that was setup in the beginning of Adventism from 1830-1894.It has taken me 7 years of constant study to learn what I am sharing with you below. 

Learn critical soul saving info below that is happening right now regarding the Ten Virgin parable which is paralleled in the SDA movement today. Below, after the info about what is happening right now in the Advent movement, the 144,000 and the 5 wise and 5 foolish virgins and how that applies to us today, you can then click on a deceased SDA Pioneer's name and go to a page about that particular person and find links to the books, articles and sermons they wrote. We have been fully warned over and over and over to repeat the words of the early pioneers like Elder James WhiteElder Joseph BatesElder Stephen N. HaskellElder Otis NicholsElder Joseph Marsh and many others, to believe on "their word" (2SM111.2) by our Prophetess Ellen G. White. Will we obey?

"Satan is at work to undermine the faith of the people of God at this time. There are persons ready to catch up every new idea. The prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation are misinterpreted. These persons do not consider that the truth has been set forth at the appointed time [1830-1894] by the very men whom God was leading to do this special work. These men followed on step by step in the very fulfillment of prophecy, and those who have not had a personal experience in this work, are to take the Word of God and believe on “their word” who have been led by the Lord in the proclamation of the first, second, and third angels’ messages" 2SM 111-112.

Whose WORD are we to believe on? The faithful, keen, noble and true Protestant pioneers who setup the firm foundation, the landmarks, the pillars, the platform of eternal truth in the beginning of the Advent movement from 1830-1894. Here is a short example list to start with: Elder James White and his wife Ellen WhiteElder Stephen N. HaskellElder Joseph BatesElder Otis NicholsElder Joseph MarshElder J. N. AndrewsElder J. N. LoughboroughElder Apollos HaleElder William MillerElder Charles FitchElder Hiram EdsonElder O. R. L. Crosier and many more, listed below.

As the disciple Thomas had to see to believe, and when Jesus gave him the evidence he had desired, Thomas cried out, My Lord and my God. But Jesus reproved Thomas for his unbelief. He said to him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou has believed; blessed are they that have not seen and yet believed.

"So, I saw", Ellen White writes in The Great Controversy, p. 75 in the original 1858 version, "that THOSE who had no experience in the first and second angels' messages [in 1843-1844] must receive them [today] from those who had an experience [early SDA protestant pioneers from 1830-1894: to believe on "their word" (2SM111.2)], and followed down through the messages. As Jesus was crucified, so I saw that these messages [old SDA landmarks] have been crucified. And as the disciples declared that there was salvation in no other name under heaven, given among men; so, also, should the servants of God faithfully and fearlessly declare that those who embrace but a part of the truths connected with the third message must gladly embrace the first, second and third messages as God has given them or have no lot in the matter". 

This intellectual concept of who God and His Son are, in your mind, how you "see" and "understand" both of them, "Two Distinct beings" as all the early faithful, keen, noble and true Protestant SDA pioneers believed is crucial to your Salvation. See John 17:3 and Jer 9:24. Crucial means critical, decisive or critical, especially in the success or failure of something. Crucial also means "of great importance". 

Understanding the relationship of both God and His Son in our lives is key to understanding every other doctrine. Understanding who God and His Son are and how each of them works in our lives is crucial to our survival during these plagues that are soon to fall and to our eternal life. It is a life or death issue to either accept or reject the understanding of who God is per the early SDA pioneers or to reject that there are Two Distinct Beings and worship the Three-one God that believes Christ is co-equal and co-eternal with His Father of the changed religion of the modern Seventh Day Adventist church today. Co-eternal means that the Son of God never had a beginning as the Bible declares he did per Micah 5:2 and many other verses. It means that the Son of God is the same age as His Father with no beginning of His own as a Son prior to this earth being created or anything else. This is unscriptural to teach that Christ is without origin or beginning prior to this earth being created by the Son of God. Christ. 

"Bethlehem Ephrathah, you are small among the clans of Judah; One will come from you to be ruler over Israel for Me. His origin (beginning) is from antiquity, from eternity" Micah 5:2 NASB. Click here to read this verse in other translations and also see the cross references. 

"His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity" Micah 5:2 NASB. 
"whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting"  Micah 5:2 KJV.
"whose coming forth is from of old, from ancient days" Micah 5:2 ESV.
"one whose origins are from the distant past" Micah 5:2 NLT.
"whose origins are from of old, from ancient times" Micah 5:2 NIV.
"His origin is from antiquity, from eternity" Micah 5:2 HCSB.
"His existence has been from antiquity, even from eternity" Micah 5:2 ISV.
"one whose origins are in the distant past" Micah 5:2 NB.
"whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 NHEB.
"His origins go back to the distant past, to days long ago" Micah 5:2 GWT.
"Whose goings forth are from of old, from ancient days" Micah 5:2 JPS Tanakh 1917.
"His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity" Micah 5:2 New American Standard 1977.
"and his goings forth are from the beginning, from the days of the ages" Micah 5:2 Jubilee Bible 2000.
"whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 King James 2000 Bible.
"whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 American King James Version.
"whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 American Standard Version.
"and his going forth is from the beginning, from the days of eternity" Micah 5:2 Douay-Rheims Bible.
"whose goings forth are from of old, from the days of eternity" Micah 5:2 Darby Bible Translation.
"whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 English Revised Version.
"whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 Webster's Bible Translation.
"whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting" Micah 5:2 World English Bible.
"And his comings forth are of old, From the days of antiquity" Micah 5:2 Young's Literal Translation.

Babylon's (Adventism's) crowning sin was that of imputing (impregnanting) all of her wisdom and power unto false gods.

"To souls that are earnestly seeking for light and that accept with gladness every ray of divine illumination from His holy Word, to such alone light will be given. It is through these souls that God will reveal that light and power which will lighten the whole earth with His glory."--5T 729 (1889).

“The unity that exists between Christ and His disciples does not destroy the personality of either. They are ONE in purpose, in mind, in character, but not in personIt is thus that God and Christ are one.”-Ellen White, Testimonies for the Church 8:268, 269.

"Christ is one with the Father, but Christ and God are two distinct personages.  Read the prayer of Christ in the seventeenth chapter of John, and you will find this point clearly brought out.  How earnestly the Saviour prayed that His disciples might be one with Him as He is one with the Father" Ellen White RH June 1, 1905), THE UPWARD LOOK, PAGE 153.

"Jesus prayed that his disciples might be one as he was one with his Father. This prayer did not contemplate one disciple with twelve heads, but twelve disciples, made one in object and effort in the cause of their master. Neither are the Father and the Son parts of the “three-one God.” They are two distinct beings, yet one in the design and accomplishment of redemption. The redeemed, from the first who shares in the great redemption, to the last, all ascribe the honor, and glory, and praise, of their salvation, to both God and the Lamb." (James White, 1868, Life Incidents, page 343) 

As the light is diffused, given to others, greater light will come. The reason why the churches sit in darkness and have no light, is that they have not given light, they have not been as a city set upon a hill, that cannot be hid.” RH, February 10, 1891 par. 13

“ Every act of consecration to God brings joy; for as we appreciate the light He has given us, more and greater light will comeML 174.4

Yet every mind through whom the Holy Spirit has worked has presented these themes in a light that is fresh and new. The truths of redemption are capable of constant development and expansionThough old, they are ever newconstantly revealing to the seeker for truth a greater glory and a mightier powerIn every age there is a new development of trutha message of God to the people of that generation. The old truths are all essential; new truth is not independent of the old, but an unfolding of it. It is only as the old truths are understood that we can comprehend the new. When Christ desired to open to His disciples the truth of His resurrection, He began "at Moses and all the prophets" and "expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning Himself." Luke 24:27. But it is the light which shines in the fresh unfolding of truth that glorifies the oldHe who rejects or neglects the new does not really possess the oldFor him it loses its vital power and becomes but a lifeless form. COL 127-128 

Follow every ray of light that you seeand that which is shadowy will be made clear to your understanding as you walk in the light.ST, January 24, 1895 par. 5.

"The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced." –{Selected Messages Book 1, p. 204.2}

Today, a lot of "Adventists" don't like the "sound" of the word "TRINITY" because it ties them to the Roman Catholic's foundational doctrine. So they say "I don't believe in the Trinity, but I believe in three-Gods who are one God". THIS IS STILL A TRIUNE GOD! JUST ANOTHER FLAVOR or VERSION of the TRINITY. It is actually a worse doctrine than the Catholic Trinity if that were possible! 

Just because you don't "like" the "sound" of the word "trinity" and you don't use it does NOT mean you are not a trinitarian! It does not mean you don't believe in the "concept" of the Trinity just because you don't SAY the word "TRINITY"!

There are some, who upon accepting erroneous theories, strive to establish them by collecting from my writings statements of truth, which they use, separated from their proper connection and perverted by association with error. Letter 136, April 27, 1906, to Brethren Butler, Daniels, and Irwin. (Ellen White, 1906, This Day with God, page 126)

As Moses was to Israel, a type of Christ, so James S. White is to the Adventist movement, 

As you study the trinity topic, I would encourage you to make a list of all the reasons WHY people say to you or that you read why you should believe in the trinity. I wish I had started this list when I first started studying the topic of the truth about God and His Son. This list will help you help others in the future.

This list will amaze you. The exact same arguments for the trinity are used today that were presented to our Protestant early SDA pioneers from 1830-1894. These arguments are not new, Satan uses these exact same ones over and over with new people. Certain excuses people latch onto and others catch up another excuse as to "why" they should reject the pioneers writings and believe in the "new" gods, the new religion of modern Adventism.

Here's a short list of the many lies that have been told over and over for decades:
  • Ellen White ate pork and as she got new light upon the diet issue she changed and stopped eating  pork. So it is with the godhead issue. Meaning as she got new light on the Godhead message she changed gods and started worshiping the trinity. She used to be non-trinitarian and changed to believe in the trinity. Meaning she stopped worshiping only God the Father and the Son of God and INCLUDED a third being, a third person. NOT TRUE. It's a lie of the devil. 
    • Ellen White came out of worshiping the trinity when she joined the Millerite movement and did NOT go back to worshiping the Methodist's trinity of gods. 1+1+1=1 is even bad math. Ellen White was first a Methodist as a child. Methodist's worship the trinity. Ellen White stopped worshiping the trinity of Gods to become a part of the Millerite/Adventist movement along with her parent and twin sister.
  • James White was a staunch anti-trinitarian. But some will even try to say he softened in his last years and started believing in the trinity of gods, a "three-one God". NOT TRUE. It's a lie of Satan.

"Jesus prayed that his disciples might be one as he was one with his Father. This prayer did not contemplate one disciple with twelve heads, but twelve disciples, made one in object and effort in the cause of their master. Neither are the Father and the Son parts of the “three-one God.” They are two distinct beings, yet one in the design and accomplishment of redemption. The redeemed, from the first who shares in the great redemption, to the last, all ascribe the honor, and glory, and praise, of their salvation, to both God and the Lamb." (James White, 1868, Life Incidents, page 343).

"It may be objected, If the Father and the Son are two distinct beings, do you not, in worshipping the Son and calling him God, break the first commandment of the decalogue? "No; it is the Father's will 'That all men should honor the Son, even as they honor the Father.' We cannot break the commandment and dishonor God by obeying him. The Fathers says of the Son, 'Let all the angels of God worship him.' Should angels refuse to worship the Son, they would rebel against the Father. Children inherit the name of their Father. The Son of God 'hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than' the angels. That name is the name of his Father. The Father says to the Son, 'Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever.' Heb.1. The Son is called 'The mighty God.' Isa. 9:6. And when he comes again to earth his waiting people will exclaim, 'This is our God.' Isa. 25:9. It is the will of the Father that we should thus honor the Son. In doing so we render supreme honor to the Father. If we dishonor the Son, we dishonor the Father; for he requires us to honor his son. "But though the Son is called God yet there is a 'God and Father of our lord Jesus Christ' 1Pet. 1:3. Though the Father says to the Son, 'Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever,' yet, that throne is given him of his Father; and because he loved righteousness and hated iniquity, he further says, 'Therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee.' Heb. 1:9. 'God hath made that same Jesus both Lord and Christ.' Acts. 2:36. The Son is 'the everlasting Father,' not of himself, nor of his Father, but of his children. His language is, 'I and the children which God hath given me.' Heb. 2:13." R. F. COTTRELLReview and Herald, June 1, 1869.

NONE of the Protestant SDA pioneers believed in the Trinity. They believed in TWO DISTINCT BEINGS who both have the name (character=law of God) of God...we want the NAME (character) of God upon our foreheads, in our mind too. God truly has a literal Son who was born in Heaven prior to Bethlehem. God created everything through His Son, BY and FOR His Son. His Son has GIVEN everything to us! What love! What matchless love! Love means obedience. If you love me obey my Commandments Jesus says.

John Harvey Kellogg (the cereal man - if you watch this video -it explains this in great detail here: https://youtu.be/8iQcrbi774U?t=429 I've started it at a point that Ellen White warns us not to believe like Kellogg) started the Alpha of Apostasy in the SDA movement and today it has fully developed as Tritheism/trinity/tri gods - simply Nimrod, Semarmis and Tammuz renamed into Biblical "sounding" names ["God the Father", "God the Son" & "God the Holy Spirit"] to deceive if possible the very elect. (Adventists). Kellogg was eventually disfellowshiped by the early SDA pioneers for believing in the trinity. His Pantheism developed into the trinity/Tritheism. You can watch an excellent video showing some of this history in this YouTube video: https://youtu.be/hlgqyMdfRXs

Here's a picture (below) I've made that makes this terrible situation more clear that we as a modern Adventist people have gotten ourselves into by rejecting the great light that was setup in the beginning of Adventism. From 1830-1894 time frame. I think the last message God gave the Advent people was in 1894 and it was about diet - The PLEDGE to abstain from flesh meats, dairy and counterfeit stimulants ect. 

Consecrate My Table Pledge


      “I solemnly promise, before God, to abstain from tobacco, spirituous liquors, snuff, tea, soda, eggs, dairy, refined white sugar and flour, coffee, flesh-meats, butter, spices, rich cake, mince pies, a large amount of salt, and animal fat of all kinds, baking powder, soda or saleratus (baking soda) in any form, and cheese, and from all exciting articles of food, and to abstain from eating between meals, and to do all I can to induce others to do likewise.”

Signature: ____________________________ Date: _______/________/________

Here's the picture:

Inline image 1

The leading churches in the United States ARE the 501c3 churches of America. This includes the 501c3 (tax-exempt, non-profit, -this means they can give you a tax deductable receipt when you pay your tithes for your tax return - this means way more, but that's all most people know about what a "501c3 status" is. A 501c3 is the tax status of an entity, a corporation = all corporations are derived from the Vatican government whether they know it or not = a 501c3 means they are a Vatican church extension, as the modern SDA has become the church militant that has rejected the early SDA protestant pioneers doctrines. Two groups have been setup in the SDA movement today...they are both growing stronger. The wise virgin group who adhere strictly to the SDA pioneers writings and those who reject the pioneer writings, the foolish virgin group.

I don't know if you've read the tons of quotes or fully realized their significance for us today. I've read them in the past, but did not realize their importance for us today as I do now.

IF we believe that Ellen White was inspired, and I do and I believe you do, then we must consider these as warnings sent from God to us, that will save us from ourselves and from being steeped in the habits of the false leaders in the modern 501c3 SDA church who have REJECTED the early SDA pioneers doctrines. I believe I'd be safe to say today that the mass majority of modern SDA church leadership has rejected all of the early SDA doctrines. Now there are many blind sheep in this flock of SDA's that do not realize what has happened. Meaning they don't realize the magnitude of what the leadership have rejected, the early 1830-1894 doctrines of the faithful, keen, noble and true Protestant SDA pioneers like Elder James S. and Ellen G. White, Stephen N. Haskell, J. N. Andrews, Joseph Bates, William Miller, Otis Nichols, Joseph Marsh and so many others. 

Ellen White warns: “Let the aged men who were pioneers in our work speak plainly, and let those who are dead speak also, by the reprinting of their articles in our periodicals”—Ellen White, Manuscript 62, 1905, cited in “The Integrity of the Sanctuary Message.”

Ellen White warns: “We are to REPEAT THE WORDS of the pioneers in our work, who knew what it cost to search for the truth as for hidden treasure, and who labored to lay the foundation of our workThe word given me is, Let that which these men have written in the past be reproduced”—Ellen White, Review and Herald, May 25, 1905.

It is imperative to study the pioneers platform of eternal truth writings that were setup by God Himself in the beginning of Adventism. The modern 501c3 church, called GENERAL CONFERENCE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST has rejected the early SDA pioneer doctrines, which means apostasy from the truth and rejection of the great light, the writings of the SDA Protestant Pioneers!

"The truths that we received in 1841, '42, '43, and '44 are now to be studied and proclaimedThe messages of the first, second, and third angels will in the future be proclaimed with a loud voice. They will be given with earnest determination and in the power of the Spirit" 15MR Ltr 75 1905.

"The message of the fall of Babylon, as given by the second angel [Rev. 14:8]is repeated, with the additional mention of the corruption's which have been entering the [SDA] churches since 1844. The work of this angel comes in at the right time to join in the last great work of the third angel's [Rev. 14:9-12 anti-Pope's anti-trinity, anti-sunday] message as it swells to a loud cry" Early Writtings, p. 277.1.

"The leaven of godliness has not entirely lost its power. At the time when the danger and depression of the church are greatest, the little company who are standing in the light will be sighing and crying for the abominations that are done in the land. But MORE ESPECIALLY will their prayers arise in behalf of the church because its MEMBERS are doing after the manner of the world... They mourn before God to see religion despised in the very homes of those who have had great light [the "truths given in 1841, '42, '43 and 184415MR Ltr 75 1905.]. They lament and afflict their souls because pride, avarice, selfishness, and deception of almost every kind are in the [501c3 SDA] church" –E.G. White, Testimonies, Vol. 5, 209, 210.

"This is what the LORD says: "For three sins of Judah, even for four, I will not relent. Because they have rejected the law of the LORD and have not kept his decrees, because they have been led astray by false gods, the gods their ancestors followed" Amos 2:4.

"For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed" Isaiah 9:16.

"Leave them; they are blind guides. If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit" Matthew 15:14.

The counterfeit trinity came into the "churches" around the same time as another counterfeit to the truth, Sunday worship sprang into being, because from the trinity springs ALL counterfeit doctrines or ideas, such as a more developed Sun worship, the old sly devil cunningly deceiving people to worship a false concept of God that lies very close to the track of truth and to worship this strange trinity of gods on a counterfeit day of worship, Sunday, the first day of the week instead of Saturday from sundown Friday night to sundown Saturday night.

"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" Matthew 15:9.

Tritheism (another form, version, flavor of the trinity) is the teaching that the Godhead is really three separate beings forming three separate gods:

1 = God "God the Father"
= God "God the Son" 
1 = God "God the Holy Spirit" 
3 = Gods

Pagan, heathen "triads" which are the predecessors of the Trinity idea. Nimrod, Tammuz and Semiramis.

Tammuz is the false Christ worshiped by millions today. Tammuz is also known as "another Jesus" per 2 Cor. 11:3-4 and Col. 2:8.

There is only one church that has received "light from heaven" since 1844 and has now rejected that light! 

The Great light is the writings/doctrines of the early SDA Protestant pioneers. 

Like the books, articles and sermons written by Stephen N. Haskell, J. N. Andrews. James S. White....lots of faithful, keen, noble and true early SDA Protestant Pioneers who are all now dead. 

Ellen White, the INSPIRED prophetess of God warns and encourages us today:

1905: “Let the aged men who were pioneers in our work speak plainly, and let those who are dead speak also, by the reprinting of their articles in our periodicals”—Ellen White, Manuscript 62, 1905.

“We are to REPEAT THE WORDS of the pioneers in our work, who knew what it cost to search for the truth as for hidden treasure, and who labored to lay the foundation of our workThe word given me is, Let that which these men have written in the past be reproduced”—Ellen White, Review and Herald, May 25, 1905.

"those who have not had a personal experience in this work [1830-1894], are to take the Word of God and believe on “their word” who have been led by the Lord in the proclamation of the first, second, and third angels’ messages" 2SM 111-112.

“We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history [1830-1894, non-trinity, non-Sunday, non-Eucharist, we can be sin-free]” Life Sketches, p. 196. 

We have been told to sit the people down like Moses did and recount all the Lord has done in leading us out as a people. (Letter 105, 1903).

Did you know Ellen White said her husband was similar to Moses in some respects leading the modern "Adventist" movement out of apostasy? She even had a vision about this.

“Many of the pioneers, who shared with us these trials and victories, remained true till the close of life, and have fallen asleep in Jesus. Among these is the faithful warrior who for thirty-six years stood by my side in the battle for truth. God used him as a teacher and leader to stand in the front ranks during the severe struggles of those early days of the message; but he has fallen at his post, and, with others who have died in the faith, he awaits the coming of the Lifegiver, who will call him from his gloomy prison-house to a glorious immortality” RH, November 20, 1883 par. 6.

“He (James S. White) received a commendation that few others have attained. God has permitted the precious light of truth to shine upon His word and illuminate the mind of my husbandHe may reflect the rays of light from the presence of Jesus upon others by his preaching and writing” Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church Volume 3, p. 502.

"In a vision given me at Bordoville, Vermont, December 10, 1871, I was shown that the position of my husband has been a very difficult one. A pressure of care and labor has been upon him. His brethren in the ministry have not had these burdens to bear, and they have not appreciated his labors. The constant pressure upon him has taxed him mentally and physically. I was shown that his relation to the people of God was similar, in some respects, to that of Moses to Israel. There were murmurers against Moses, when in adverse circumstances, and there have been murmurers against him." Testimonies for the Church Volume 3, Page 85

As Moses was a type of Christ leading the ancient children of Israel, so James White, says Ellen White, was a type of Moses, leading the modern children of Israel into the Heavenly Canaan.

Ellen G. White held her husband, James S. White up as an example for others to follow. She, of all people knew he vehemently rejected the trinity doctrine as unbiblical. She said James White was a type of Moses, that he was KEEN, NOBLE & TRUE and that he had been given GREAT light also, and was to speak and WRITE it out for OTHERS. She, as a true prophet of God would not ask others to follow her husband's leading if she herself did not believe the trinity was error. Remember? She stated that ALL of the pioneers came into harmony and were UNITED in the TRUTH! That included herself too! New truths do NOT contradict old truths or new light does not contradict OLD LIGHT, it only enhances the old light! 

OLD LIGHT given in the beginning of Adventism grows brighter, "new light" will NOT contradict old light.

"The old truths are all essential; new truth is not independent of the old, but an unfolding of it. It is only as the old truths are understood that we can comprehend the new" Ellen White, COL 127-128.

"Who has authority to begin such a [NEW] movement? [to abandon the pillars/landmarks/foundation/marks/ideas/same mind/mouth/writings/seal of God that was upon the pioneers] We have our Bibles, we have our experience, attested to by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. WE HAVE A TRUTH THAT ADMITS OF NO COMPROMISE. Shall we not repudiate everything that is not in harmony with this truth [1830-1894 early Pioneers writings/teachings/3 angel's messages]?E.G. White, Selected Messages, Vol. 1, 204, 205.

"The history of the early experiences in the message will be a power to withstand the masterly ingenuity of Satan’s deceptions" Ellen White, Letter 99, 1905.

Pretty plain statement there by Sister White. NONE of the SDA pioneers believed in the trinity. Ellen White warned us our religion would be "changed". 

"The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changedThe fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new (hierarchical / popish) organization would be established" –{Selected Messages Book 1, p. 204.2}.

Tritheism (Tritheism is Pantheism fully developed from the Alpha of apostasy into the Omega of Apostasy that Ellen White warned us about....Tritheism is a tri-gods, triune flavor/version of the trinity- actually a worse version of the trinity than the Catholic version of the trinity). What the modern SDA church is teaching today, is that the Godhead is really three separate distinct beings forming three separate gods. Three distinct gods. All of our PROTESTANT pioneers believe in TWO distinct gods. God and His Son. Jesus also has a God and Father. See 1 Cor 8:6 "But to us there is but one God, the Father". The God and Father of Jesus is the SOURCE of ALL THINGS. We receive all things from Jesus who is our both human and divine God and Father, and Jesus receives all things from His Father and God. 

Children inherit the name of their father. The Son of God “hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than the angels” — (R.F. Cottrell, Review and Herald, June 1, 1869).

Here's a couple of videos that will help to understand this better:

Historical examination of the Alpha and Omega of Apostasy: https://youtu.be/8iQcrbi774U

David Clayton - The Omega

1903: "The warning has come: Nothing is to be allowed to come in that will disturb the foundation of the faith upon which we have been building ever since the message came in 1842, 1843, and 1844. I was in this message, and ever since I have been standing before the world, true to the light that God has given us. We do not propose to take our feet off the platform on which they were placed as day by day we sought the Lord with earnest prayer, seeking for light. Do you think that I could give up the light that God has given me? It is to be as the Rock of AgesGCB April 6th1903.

When they (early SDA pioneers) came to something they all did not agree and understand, they would pray together, and God would show her the truth. They all worked together to hammer out the foundations of the early SDA church beliefs. "Whatever contradicts God's word, we may be sure proceeds from Satan." Patriarchs and Prophets, page 55, paragraph 2. "There is one straight chain of truth without one heretical sentence in that which I have written." — Ellen G. White, Letter 329A, 1905. (references: MS 135, 1903. (The Early Years, p. 145; James S. White, "type of Moses", Testimonies for the Church Volume 3, Page 85; "Moses was a type of Christ." {Patriarchs & Prophets, Chapter 43, p. 480-481; James White was "Keen, Noble & True" and was given "GREAT LIGHT also" and "he was to speak and WRITE it out for OTHERS", Selected Messages bk.1, p. 206-7 1904; ] As Moses was a type of Christ leading the ancient children of Israel, so James White, says Ellen White, was a type of Moses, leading the modern spiritual children of Israel into the Heavenly Canaan.

"Like the Jews, many have closed their eyes lest they should see; but there is as great peril now, in closing the eyes to light, and in walking apart from Christ, feeling need of nothing, as there was when he was upon earth" RH, Aug. 26, 1890. "A clear conception of what God is, and what He requires us to be, will give us humble views of self" Ellen White, RH June 2, 1896. "The SAME arguments are still urged against all who dare to present, in opposition to established errors, the plain and direct teachings of God's word" GC p. 148. "I saw that the strength of the children of God is in their humility. When they are little in their own eyes, Jesus will be to them their strength and their righteousness, and God will prosper their labors" 3 Testimonies p. 307.

"I call upon those who have been connected with these binding influences to break the yoke to which they have long submitted, and stand as free men in Christ. Nothing but a determined effort will break the spell that is upon them. Be not deceived; many will depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils. We have now before us the alpha of this danger. The omega will be of a most startling nature" 1 Selected Messages, p.197.

"Already there are coming in among our people spiritualistic teachings [Trinity] that will undermine the faith of those who give heed to them. The theory that God is an essence pervading all nature [Pantheism - watch video here about this: https://youtu.be/8iQcrbi774U?t=108 and another video here https://youtu.be/RSoFr3_EmuI], is one of Satan's most subtle devices. It misrepresents God, and is a dishonor to His greatness and majesty. Pantheistic [fully developed into Tritheism/trinity] theories are not sustained by the Word of God.The Light of His Truth shows that these [trinity] theories are soul-destroying agencies. Darkness is their element, sensuality their sphere. They gratify the natural heart, and give license to inclination . . . .

"These theories [trinity], followed to their logical conclusionsweep away the whole Christian economy. They do away with the necessity for the atonement, and make man his own savior. These theories regarding God make His Word of no effect, and those who accept them are in great danger of being led finally to look upon the whole Bible as a fiction . . . !" Evangelism, p.601-602.

James S. White wrote: “It is only when we stop believing right that we stop doing right Best stories from the best book, Bible companion for the home. James Edson White 1900 page 161.

Ellen White said her husband was "The best man that ever trod shoe-leather." 

"All the messages given from 1840-1844 (old SDA pioneer doctrines aka non-marks of the beast doctrines) are to be made forcible now, for there are many people who havelost their bearings. The messages are to go to all the [501c3 SDA] churches" Ellen White, 21MR 437.1.

"In the balances of the sanctuary the Seventh-day Adventist Church is to be weighed. She will be judged by the privileges and advantages that she has had. If her spiritual experience does not correspond to the advantages that Christ, at infinite cost, has bestowed on her, if the blessings conferred have not qualified her to do the work entrusted to her, on her will be pronounced the sentence: "Found wanting." By the light bestowed, the opportunities given, will she be judged" {LDE 59.3}.

The biggest thing that has come to my mind is that we need to be studying the SDA Protestant Pioneers writings LIKE SHE TELLS US TO DO! 

1905 "let those who are dead speak also, by the reprinting of their articles in our periodicals”—Ellen White, Manuscript 62, 1905.

“We are to REPEAT THE WORDS of the pioneers in our work, who knew what it cost to search for the truth as for hidden treasure, and who labored to lay the foundation of our work. The word given me is, Let that which these men have written in the past be reproduced”—Ellen White, Review and Herald, May 25, 1905.

God is our helper, of whom shall we fear? 1 Peter 1:4 claim Bible verse promises in the Most Holy Place in the Heavenly Sanctuary to obtain the divine character of Christ. Like Luke 21:15, James 3:2, Deut 30:6, Zech 3:4, Isaiah 45:24.... so many exceedingly great and precious promises God has given us through His Son! The Son of God did not speak His own words but the words His Father GAVE HIM to speak to us. Claim Luke 21:15! :)

Check out TrinityTruth.org as well! It's a great resource for God's People in these last days.