Jesuits: Society of Jesus/Date founded September 27, 1540

The most dangerous man in Adventist history Le Roy E Froom Leroy
List of KNOWN JESUITS in the Seventh-day Adventist movement:
  1. Arthur Grosvenor Daniells - Jesuit A. G. Daniells put all Adventists necks in the Judas suicide noose by betraying, selling out our medical education work when he brought accreditation (to be molded by Babylon teachings/doctrines) into SDA schools beginning at Loma Linda. “The whole question of medical education is -becoming an increasingly difficult one . . But our necks are in the noose.”—P.T. Magan, letter to Professor H.J. Klooster, September 1, 1937. C
  2. hanges in our educational work dramatically 
  3. changed the entire fabric of our denomination. Learn more in the book called "The Broken Blueprint" by Vance Ferrell, and another of his 
  4. books called "Solving Our Church Crisis" states on pages 14-16 that A. G. Daniells pushed through accreditation of the our new medical Loma Linda schools. This set in circumstances how the AMA gained control of our schools and changed what we taught from the truth of natural remedies to counterfeit "healing" through prescription drugs, the sorceries aka witchcraft. Learn how prescription drugs are one of the MARKS of the beast here
  5. Le Roy Edwin Froom (October 16, 1890 – February 20, 1974) - known Jesuit, buried in a Masonic plot, also known as the most dangerous man in the Adventist church
  6. Robert H. Pierson (1911-1989) President of GC in 1966. Attempted to gain control of Adventist studies. He tried to hide that the leadership has rejected the early SDA pioneer doctrines of the Sanctuary, the Trinity, and so many more doctrines.  Modern SDA church denomination, having apostatized, meaning rejected the early SDA Protestant Pioneers doctrines of the Advent movement from 1830-1894, the modern 501c3 Adventist leaders today falsely claim William Miller was not a great scholar because of the 1843/1844 dates. See video of this here notice he mentions Raymond Cottrell (1911-2003)Inline image 1"In a representation which passed before me, I saw a certain work being done by medical missionary workers [ROBERT H. PIERSON?]. Our ministering brethren were looking on, watching what was being done, but they did not seem to understand. The foundation of our faith, which was established by so much prayer, such earnest searching of the Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar by pillar. Our faith was to have nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary was gone, the atonement was gone" E.G. White, The Upward Look, 152. And Pierson wanted to keep this fact HIDDEN from the laity. He wanted to keep it a secret that the doctrines had been changed while the foolish laodicean virgins slept on. Learn more here.
  7. The Trinity doctrine throws out the Sanctuary Doctrine long held by SDA. The Trinity actually invites Satan to be part of the Godhead....he replaces the power and personality of God with himself as the Spirit, thus the confusion and utter lack of sense that is the Trinity doctrine. It makes no sense, and it is not mentioned in the Bible anywhere.
“Wherefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.” 1 Corinthians 10:14

The Trinity is the god of the dead:
Trinity: "Osiris, god of the dead: Killed by his brother Seth, Osiris was brought back to life by his wife Isis and by Anubis, who embalmed his body. Osiris, however did not return to earth where he once reigned, but became the god of the dead (trinity worshipers)- who, if his teachings were followed, could also grant eternal life (eternal DEATH really)" The Encylopedia of Ancient Egypt, page 200.

Does the Bible Support the Idea of the Trinity?

While the word Trinity is not found in the Bible, is the concept of the Trinity taught clearly in it?

The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol. 15 1987 admits: ‘Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity.'

The New Catholic Encyclopedia: ‘The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the Old Testament.'
The Encyclopedia of Religion says: ‘Theologians agree that the New Testament also does not contain an explicit doctrine of the Trinity.'

The Encyclopedia Britannica 1976 observes: Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament.'

Protestant theologian Karl Barth (as quoted in The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology 1976) similarly states: ‘The New Testament does not contain the developed doctrine of the Trinity. The Bible lacks the express declaration the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are of equal essence.'

“Some will tend to resist this doctrine (the trinity) because it is NOT found expressly stated in the scriptures.” Adventist Review Aug 20, 1993, Page 8.

"While no single scriptural passage states formally the doctrine of the Trinity, it is assumed as a fact by Bible writers and mentioned several times. Only by faith can we accept the existence of the Trinity" Adventist Review, Vol. 158, No. 31, p. 4. 

“Likewise the Trinitarian understanding of God, now part of our fundamental beliefs, was not generally held by the early Adventists.  Even today a few do not subscribe to it”  William G. Johnsson, Adventist Review, January 6, 1994, p. 10,11.

1990 Herbert Ford, news director for the SDA denomination, told the Indianapolis Star that Adventists who want to cling to the church’s historic anti-Catholic beliefs represent only about 1,000 of the church’s 750,000 North American members. ARKANSAS CATHOLIC, July 29, 1990, Page 8.

  1. Dr. Kellogg - Jesuit influenced?
  2. Jesuit Dwight K. Nelson
  3. Jesuit Neal C Wilson Meet the Wilsons.  Info about Ted Wilson's father who was a 33rd degree Mason!  Download and print this PDF document.
  4. Ted Wilson - what has HE done? He fulfilled Ellen White's LAST WARNING Message - he made of none effect the writings of Ellen White in the 2015 GC conference session. More info about Ted N. C. Wilson here.
  5. Jesuit Louis Were (Were was endorsed by Hans K. LaRondelle, Th.D., a prominent pastor who worked to bring New Theology into the denomination, and Cottrell worked with Edward Heppenstall on his revision of Daniel 11. Heppenstall was one of the first to try to instill the doctrine of original sin into the church. "The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new (501c3 non-prophet/profit/tax-exempt) organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy (metaphorical / hypothetical / symbol / figure of speech / pretend) would be introduced" —{Selected Messages Book 1, p. 204.2}.  "These kindred heresies (The Trinity from which springs ALL false doctrines like Immortality of the Soul and Sunday Sacredness, etc), and the rejection of the truth convert the church into Babylon" —1MR 302.2.)
  6. Inline image 1Jesuit Raymond F. Cottrell 1911-2003 - Raymond Forrest Cottrell (April 21, 1911, Los Angeles, California – January 12, 2003, Calimesa, California) was a controversial Adventist theologian, missionary, teacher, writer and editor. He was an associate editor of both the Adventist Review (the church's official news magazine) and the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary. Raymond Cottrell, is seen by some as a "progressive Adventist", as he disagreed with certain traditional positions of the church, including the investigative judgment,[The 'Sanctuary Doctrine' – Asset or Liability?" by Raymond Cottrell, presented publicly in 2001 and 2002] and served in an editorial role for the independently owned and operated magazine Adventist Today. He was a consulting editor to Spectrum Inline image 1magazine, another independent Adventist paper, both which leaned to progressive Adventist viewpoints. He was the first Adventist to become a member of a scholarly theological society, and was instrumental in the founding of the Biblical Research Institute along with Jesuit Le Roy Froom. Raymon Cottrell independently owned the magazine called "Adventist Today". Raymond F. Cottrell (1911-2003) taught biblical exegesis at PCU, one of the first schools to be accredited. Raymond F. Cottrell did not believe foundational doctrine of the Sanctuary was found in the Bible. He rejected the Sanctuary doctrine: "Those who try to bring in theories that would remove the pillars of our faith concerning the sanctuary or concerning the personality of God or of Christ, are working as BLIND MEN. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the people of God adrift without an anchor” MR769.5"These men were constantly saying, “God is with us. We stand in the light. We have the truth.” I inquired who these men were, and was told that they were ministers and leading men who had rejected the light themselves, and were unwilling that others should receive it." EARLY WRITINGS, PAGE 241. Raymond Cottrell believed James and Ellen White were WRONG and he tries to teach people another way to study the Bible that is different from William Miller and all the early SDA pioneers taught hereThe knowledge of Sanctuary is and was the truth that God gave to the SDA Church in sacred trust. Anyone preaching fanciful tales other than the Sanctuary is a false voice on the periphery of Adventism.

"The correct understanding of the ministration in the heavenly sanctuary is the foundation of our faith" Lt 208, 1906 (June 29, 1906) par. 4.
  • Ellen G. White, in a statement written on April 21, 1847, declared in endorsement of the Crosier article on the sanctuary question: CIHS 5.2. “The Lord showed me in vision, more than one year ago, that Brother Crosier had the true light, on the cleansing of the sanctuary, etc.; and that it was His will, that Brother Crosier should write out the view which he gave us in the Day-Star Extra, February 7, 1846. I feel fully authorized by the Lord, to recommend that Extra, to every saint.”—A Word to the Little Flock, 12. CIHS 5.3. You can read it [Crosier’s Article “The Law of Moses,” The Day-Star Extra, February 7, 1846, online here, or download a pdf of it here. Learn how to enter the secret hiding place of God so you will be a Berean "Prepper" here and not receive the 7 last plagues here.
“Those who seek to remove the old landmarks (changing to the Trinity doctrine from the early SDA pioneers non-trinity stance) are NOT holding fastthey are not remembering how they have received and heard. Those who try to bring in theories that would remove the pillars of our faith concerning the sanctuary or concerning the personality of God or of Christ [Trinity/Sanctuary doctrine], are working as BLIND MEN. They are seeking to bring in uncertainties and to set the people of God adrift without an anchor” MR769.5.

"In the balances of the sanctuary the Seventh-day Adventist Church is to be weighed. She will be judged by the privileges and advantages [great light setup at the beginning of Adventism = Old SDA pioneer doctrines, the platform of eternal truth] that she has had. If her spiritual experience does not correspond to the advantages that Christ, at infinite cost, has bestowed on her, if the blessings conferred have not qualified her to do the work entrusted to her, on her will be pronounced the sentence: "Found wanting." By the light bestowed, the opportunities given, will she be judgedLDE 59.3.

“The subject of the sanctuary and the investigative judgment should be clearly understood by the people of God.”—The Great Controversy, 488.

I know that the sanctuary question stands in righteousness and truth, just as we have held it for so many years. It is the enemy that leads minds off on sidetracks. He is pleased when those who know the truth become engrossed in collecting scriptures to pile around erroneous theories, which have no foundation in truth. The scriptures thus used are misapplied; they were not given to substantiate error, but to strengthen truth.”Gospel Workers, 303; Christ in His Sanctuary, p. 1.2 (Ellen G. White)

"In a representation which passed before me, I saw a certain work being done by medical missionary workers. Our ministering brethren were looking on, watching what was being done, but they did not seem to understand. The foundation of our faith, which was established by so much prayer, such earnest searching of the Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar by pillar. Our faith was to have nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary was gone, the atonement was gone." E.G. White, The Upward Look, 152.

SDA 2015 GC Session Proposal: replacing Ellen White for teachers from Babylon.
The Last Deception of Satan

Satan is ... constantly pressing in the spurious—to lead away from the truth. The very last deception of Satan will be to make of none effect the testimony of the Spirit of God. “Where there is no vision, the people perish” (Proverbs 29:18). Satan will work ingeniously, in different ways and through different agencies, to unsettle the confidence of God's remnant people in the true testimony.—Letter 12, 1890. 1SM 48.3

There will be a hatred kindled against the testimonies which is satanic. The workings of Satan will be to unsettle the faith of the churches in them, for this reason: Satan cannot have so clear a track to bring in his deceptions and bind up souls in his delusions if the warnings and reproofs and counsels of the Spirit of God are heeded.—Letter 40, 1890. 1SM 48.4

Excerpt from the Jesuit Oath:

"I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus. In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever! All of which, I, _, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant"

If you read Principles of Ecclesiastical Law you will realize that all corporations on Earth are subject to the Roman Curia and the Roman Pontiff.

These corporations--- IBM, Exxon, Pepsi-Cola-----things which we personify much as we do the Church, are not really things. They are organizations of men. Many of these organizations of men don't realize that their corporate charter is issued by the Pope, but, in the end, so it is. The Roman Curia invented corporations as an entire concept---- foundations, trusts, cooperatives---you name it, they invented it. They hold the patent of patents on the fictional world. It is their enchilada entirely. And, as such, they are responsible for it, by Maxim of Law.

Link to Principles of Ecclesiastical Law:

This includes all the "non-profits", the 501c3's that "think" they are or ONCE WERE, Protestant denominations. But when they partook of Satan's dangled carrot, they became "CATHOLIC" and are now hopelessly trapped. You can't discriminate against a minority group, like woman's ordination - the Bible does not teach that women should be ordained ministers, another minority group, LBGTQ: Lesbian, bisexual, gay, transgender, queer/questioning. Gender identity: A person's sense of their own identity as a female (girl or woman), a male (a boy or man), or other gender (for example, transgender, bi-gender or gender queer which is a rejection of the traditional binary view of gender). If you tell what the Bible teaches about this today in any 501c3 denomination you will have your non-profit status revoked and be liable for all back taxes, interest and penalties back to the original filing date. This would bankrupt the church who has been bound and gagged by the corporation and the Federal 501c3 IRS. The tax status a 501c3 provides. They did not need to ask the government for something they already possessed as an inalienable right from God.

It gets so much deeper. It is the mark of the Beast, for anyone to adopt doctrines in common with the Papacy like the Trinity, Sunday worship, immortality of the soul, Eucharist, the belief that we cannot be sin free, etc.. These are counterfeit doctrines setup to deceive the whole world and keep them from obeying the plain law of God found in Exodus 20.

Bottom line, we need Jesus. The TRUE Jesus. There is also another Jesus! Yes, hard to believe, but there is a counterfeit Jesus. See 2 Cor 11:3-4.

2 Corinthians 11:3-4(KJV) 3 But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. 4 For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with (beware of) him.

This counterfeit Jesus name is Tammuz, born on Dec 25th. The TRUE Jesus was born in the Spring, the time when the Spring lambs were born, around the last of March and the beginning of April.

The book called the "TWO BABYLONS 
explains this in great detail and is an amazing book.

It is imperative that we understand who the false Jesus and the True Jesus are in these end times or else we will be deceived by this false Jesus doctrines. Nearly all of the whole world bows down and worships - this false Jesus on December 25 by the Catholic CHRIST-MASS. Mary Christ Mass. Merry Christmas is really Mary Christ Mass for Tammuz the Catholic false Christ.

I know, it's hard to change the traditions and ideas that have been steeped into our minds for centuries.

How much do we want of Jesus? Jesus said to forsake ALL and follow Him. How much are we willing to forsake? We must study like our life depends on it, because it does. Our eternal life.

List of KNOWN JESUITS in the Adventist church:

Louis Wereʼs and Raymond F. Cottrellʼs writings which date from about 1949 and 1943 respectively, and is emphatically NOT a landmark of our faith. In the book, An Exhaustive Ellen G. White Commentary on Daniel Volume 1, page 381, under the heading of “What Church Leaders Say About Louis Were”, we find the following endorsement by Harold West, Ministerial Director: He says, Louis Were was one of the first (emphasis supplied) to speak out of the Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo syndrome that had possessed SDAʼs for so long.

Now if Louis Were “was one of the first to speak out of (or against) the Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo” interpretation, then this should be all the evidence that we need to prove that the original, or pioneer, position was the “Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo” position. (We will find that another reason Were vilifies the “Valley of Megiddo” teaching is because the King of the North, and a literal interpretation of the Battle of Armageddon are inseparably linked together in prophecy.)

Shouldnʼt we be asking ourselves “Who were these men?” and “Are we in the right camp here?” Perhaps there should be a more thorough investigation into the books of Louis Were and Raymond F. Cottrell. What other changes did they attempt to bring in? (We will look at this briefly in the next chapter.) It would be well to note that this was at the same time the New Theology was being insidiously introduced into the denomination by several church “leaders”. Incidentally, Were was endorsed by Hans K. LaRondelle, Th.D., a prominent pastor who worked to bring New Theology into the denomination, and Cottrell worked with Edward Heppenstall on his revision of Daniel 11. Heppenstall was one of the first to try to instill the doctrine of original sin into the church. Ellen White was shown what these men, and others, would do and described it this way:

As a people we have been greatly humiliated by the course that some of our brethren in responsible positions have taken in departing from the old landmarks. … We need to realize that God has given us a decided message of warning for the world, even as He gave Noah a message of warning for the antediluvians. Testimonies, Vol. 7, page 107 (emphasis supplied)

The ideas of New Theology insidiously undermined our doctrines of the Nature of Christ and the Atonement. Could it be that while the Champions for Truth rose up to form a movement against New Theology errors, they were so intent on combating those errors that they overlooked the prophetic errors that Louis Were was introducing? We will find that not only was he “the first to speak out of the Turkey, King of the North, Valley of Megiddo” position that our pioneers had always taken on prophecy, but he was also one of the first to introduce New Theology into his books, even as early as 1949! [1949 was also the year that the “Fallen Nature” of Christ was removed from the book Bible Readings for the Home.]

Godʼs people, and especially those in leadership positions, who have stood by and allowed these errors to come in and didnʼt stand up against them, should consider very carefully the following counsel:

These men who have been trusted to keep the fort have well-nigh betrayed it into the hands of the enemy. They have opened the gates to a wily foe, who has sought to destroy them. Men of experience have seen stealthy hands slipping the bolts that Satan might enter; yet they have held their peace with apparent indifference as to the results. …These persons do not realize that God holds them responsible for every advantage gained by the foe who is admitted to the fort. The desolation and ruin following lie at the door of the unfaithful sentinels, who, by their neglect, become agents in the hands of the adversary to win souls to destruction. Testimonies, vol. 4, pages 211-212

Daniells.JPGArthur Grosvenor Daniells (September 28, 1858 – April 18, 1935) See Wiki Bio on A. G. Daniells here =  E. S. Ballenger writes "And so Elder Daniells is at his old occupation. I wonder how he can look an honest man in the face, knowing what he does about Mrs. White and her testimonies. But we will have to let God take care of him. He may be perfectly honest, but I can't help but consider his position similar to the Jesuits. Believing that "the end justifies the meansSept. 29, 1933 letter written from E. S. Ballenger to Harry S. Weaver

Vance Ferrell, in his book called "Solving Our Church Crisis" states on pages 14-16 that A. G. Daniells pushed through accreditation of the our new medical Loma Linda schools. This set in circumstances how the AMA gained control of our schools and changed what we taught from the truth of natural remedies to counterfeit "healing" through prescription drugs, the sorceries aka witchcraft. Learn how prescription drugs are one of the MARKS of the beast here. Read the book called the BROKEN BLUEPRINT here.

Ellen White warns "There are those among us who occupy important positions of trust, and who have refused to follow the light (speaking of Health Reform), and their course has been displeasing to God" Lt 162, 1908 (March 29, 1908) par. 17.

From the Booklet entitled: TESTIMONIES, IGNORED, SLIGHTED & SUPPRESSED: Compiled from the Writings of Mrs. E. G. White "Gather up the rays of light that have been slighted and rejected. Gather them up with meekness, with trembling, and with fear" Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 93.3 (Ellen G. White).

Sanitarium, Calif., March 29, 1908" [Manuscript read before the delegates at the General Conference, Washington D. C., May 31, 1909.]
I am instructed to bear a message to all our people on the subject of health reform, for many have backslidden from their former loyalty to health reform principles.
God's purpose for His children is that they shall grow up to the full stature of men and women in Christ. In order to do this, they must use aright every power of mind, soul, and body. They cannot afford to waste any mental or physical strength.
The question of how to preserve the health is one of primary importance. When we study this question in the fear of God we shall learn that it is best, for both our physical and our spiritual advancement, to observe simplicity in diet. Let us patiently study this question. We need knowledge and judgment in order to move wisely in this matter. Nature's laws are not to be resisted, but obeyed.
Those who have received instruction regarding the evils of the use of flesh foods, tea and coffee, and rich and unhealthful food preparations, and who are determined to make a covenant with God by sacrifice, will not continue to indulge their appetite for food that they know to be unhealthful. God demands that the appetites be cleansed, and that self-denial be practiced in regard 
to those things which are not good. This is a work that will have to be done before His people can stand before Him a perfected people... Testimonies for the Church, vol. 9, p. 153.1 (Ellen G. White).

"The Lord has given clear light regarding the nature of the food that is to compose our diet: he has instructed us concerning the effect of unhealthful food upon the disposition and character. Shall we respond to the counsels and cautions given? Who among our brethren will Sign a Pledge to dispense with Flesh Meats, tea, coffee, and all injurious foods and become health reformers inthe truest sense of the term? If we could be benefitted by indulging the desire for flesh meats, I would not make this appeal to you; but I know that we can not. They are injurious to the physical well being and we should learn to do without them. In this experience of backsliding from the principles of reform, our people have been repeating the experience of the children of Israel in the wilderness during the forty years of travel. Those who continue to follow their own course in this respect, eating, drinking, as they please, will gradually grow careless of the instructions the Lord has given regarding other phases of the present truth; they surely reap as they have sown. I have been instructed that the students in our schools are not to be served with flesh foods, or with food preparations that will cause disturbances of the stomach. Nothing that will serve to encourage a desire for stimulants should be placed upon the table. I appeal to young and old and middle aged. Deny your appetites of these things that are doing you injury. Serve the Lord by sacrifice. Let the good work begin at Washington and go forth from there to other places. I know whereof I am writing.If a temperance pledge providing for the abstinence from flesh foods, tea, and coffee, and some other foods, that are known to be injurious, were circulated through our ranks a great and good work would be accomplished. I Ask you at this Time, will you not Circulate Such a Pledge? The means saved by such a sacrifice if used for the furtherance of the cause of God would be blessed to the salvation of many souls. Let the children have a part in this work. We are all members of the Lord's family; and the Lord would have his children, both young and old, pledge themselves to deny appetite and to save the means needed for building meeting houses, and the support of missionaries. I am instructed to say to parents, place yourselves, soul and spirit on the Lord's side of this question. We need to ever bear in mind that in these days of probation we are on trial before the Lord of the universe. Will you not give up indulgences that are doing you such injury? Words of profession are cheap; let your acts of self-denial testify that you will be obedient to the demands that God makes of his peculiar people. Then put into the treasury a portion of the means that you save by your acts of your self-denial and there will be that which is to carry on the work of God.
There are many who feel that they can not get along without flesh meat; but if they would place themselves on the Lord's side resolved to obey his requirements in this matter, they would receive strength and wisdom as did Daniel and his fellows. They would find that the Lord would give them sound, judgment and they would be surprised to see how much could be saved for the cause of God by self-denial. And the small sums gained by deeds of sacrifice will do more than larger gifts will accomplish that have not called for self-denial of self. I am sure that if you will Begin at Washington to do this work of reform, in school, in the Printing Office and among All the Working Forces, the Lord will help you to present a pledge that will help the people to return from their backslidings on the question of health reform. As you seek to carry out the will of the Lord in this particular, he will give you clear understanding of what the health reform will do for you." Backsliding in Health Reform, p. 1.2 (Ellen G. White).

THE PLEDGE “I solemnly promise, before God, to abstain from tobacco, spirituous liquors, snuff, tea, coffee, flesh-meats, butter, spices, rich cake, mince pies, a large amount of salt, and animal fat of all kinds, baking powder, soda or saleratus in any form, and cheese, and from all exciting articles of food, and to abstain from eating between meals, and to do all I can to induce others to do likewise.”


This Testimony on health reform was sent directly to Elder Daniells, but it was withheld and not circulated because HE SAID it would "split the church". It was SUPPOSED to split the church into two groups. Those who obeyed and those who did not. He evidently did not know that "the gates of hell shall not prevail against" God's true church. God's true church is composed of "faithful souls" AA p. 11 and is NOT the Laodicean church. Later on when Elder Daniells wanted to see Sister White, she refused to se him saying: I have nothing more for him. I understand that this Testimony was the LAST ONE in the way of reproof ever sent to the Laodicean Church.

saleratus is sodium bicarbonate (or sometimes potassium bicarbonate) as the main ingredient of baking powder.

"Grains, fruits, nuts, and vegetables constitute the diet chosen for us by our Creator. These foods, prepared in as simple and natural a manner as possible,  are the most healthful and nourishing. They impart a strength, a power of endurance, and a vigor of intellect, that are not afforded by a more complex and stimulating diet. [The Ministry of Healing, p. 296.1 (1905)]

"In grains, fruits, vegetables, and nuts are to be found ALL the food elements that we need." Counsels on Diet and Foods, p. 92.2

"The indulgence of appetite affects them in all the relations of life. It is seen in their family, in their church, in the prayer meeting, and in the conduct of their childrenIt has been the curse of their lives. You cannot make them understand the truths for these last days.—Counsels on Health, p. 152.

"It is impossible for those who indulge the appetite to attain to Christian perfection." Counsels on Diet and Foods, p. 57.5Testimonies for the Church Volume 2, p. 399.3

not able to occur, exist, or be done.
"a seemingly impossible task"
synonyms:not possible, out of the question, unfeasibleimpracticalimpracticable,nonviableunworkableMore
  • very difficult to deal with.
    "she was in an impossible situation"
  • informal
    (of a person) very unreasonable.
    "“Impossible woman!” the doctor complained"

  1. allow oneself to enjoy the pleasure of.
    "we indulged in some hot fudge sundaes"
    synonyms:wallow in, give oneself up to, give way to, yield to, abandon oneself to, give free rein to; More
    • become involved in (an activity, typically one that is undesirable or disapproved of).
      "I don't indulge in idle gossip"
allow oneself to enjoy a particular pleasure, especially that of alcohol.
"I only indulge on special occasions"
synonyms:treat oneself, give oneself a treat; More

    He was part of the developments in the ministerial institutes during the 1920s, emphasizing the Holy Spirit as a person other than Christ as the early pioneers taught and believed, rather than Jesus as a divine influence who is to live in our body as the Spirit of Christ, both human and Divine, and authoring the first book in the church on the Holy Spirit as the Comforter as someone other than Christ.
  • 1926 to 1950 “Le Roy Edwin Froom . . . was called to the General Conference headquarters, where he was 
    first associate secretary and then secretary of the Ministerial Association from 1926 to 1950,” the 
    SDA Encyclopedia states.  “During this time he founded The Ministry magazine and was its editor 
    for 22 years.” (ibid, Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, 1995, Review and 
    Herald Publishing Association, emphasis supplied). (Froom died at Washington Park Hospital on February 20, 1974 in Takoma Park, Maryland. His funeral was held on February 22 at noon at the Takoma Park Seventhday Adventist Church. He is buried in George Washington Cemetery, 9500 Riggs Rd., Adelphi, Maryland. His graveside is Masonic B, Plot 860. GPS coordinates for his location are N 39°, 00.667’, W 76°, 58.133”. (The Graves of Question on Doctrine. A visual history by Larry Kirkpatrick:

Inline image 1

  1. "God is glad for us to go to church both days [Saturday and Sunday]. He wants us to worship Him both days....Anybody who takes a whole day out of every week to spend with God will have more of God’s power in his life, and God can do more through him and in him." Signs of the Times, March, 1990, p 22-23.

    Here is a quote from the man who writes the Sabbath School quarterlies:

    "While the Sabbath commandment has a distinct practical value, the specific day, in and of itself, doesn’t. Thus...keeping any other day could ‘work’..." A Pause For Peace: What God’s Gift of the Sabbath Can Mean for You, p 114, by Clifford Goldstein, published by the Pacific Press Publishing Association in 1992.
  2. "We have far more to fear from within than from without. The hindrances to strength and success are far greater from the church itself than from the world. Unbelievers have a right to expect that those who profess to be keeping the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, will do more than any other class to promote and honor, by their consistent lives, by their godly example and their active influence, the cause which they represent. But how often have the professed advocates of the truth proved the greatest obstacle to its advancement! The unbelief indulged, the doubts expressed, the darkness cherished, encourage the presence of evil angels, and open the way for the accomplishment of Satan’s devices." Selected Messages Book 1, p. 122.3
Books and papers promoting Sunday worship are being published by the SDA church that have "denominational approvalSee more proof of 501c3 SDA's worshiping on Sunday by clicking here and opening a new tab:

"When the finished product carries the stamp of a standard publishing house, it bears denominational approvalIt is then a denominational, not a private, publication. It has a measure of authority and dignity not otherwise possible." Ministry, December, 1948, p 23, Review and Herald Publishing Association.

  1. "Sunday-keeping is an institution of the first beast (Papacy doctrines), and ALL who submit to obey this institution emphatically worship the first beast and receive his mark, 'the mark of the beast.' .... Those who worship the beast and his image by observing the first day are certainly idolaters, as were the worshippers of the golden calf." (Advent Review Extra, pages 10 and 11, August, 1850)
  2. Those who, understanding the claims of the fourth commandment, choose to observe the false instead of the true Sabbath; are thereby paying homage to that power by which alone it is commanded. But in the very act of enforcing a religious duty by secular power, the (501c3 non-profit/tax exempt) churches would themselves form an image to the beast; hence the enforcement of Sunday-keeping in the United States would be an enforcement of the worship of the beast and his image. {GC88 448.4}

When do her sins reach unto heaven? [Rev. 18:2-5] When the law of God is finally made void by legislation.--ST June 12, 1893.

"But in the very act of enforcing a religious duty by secular power, the (501c3 non-profit/tax exempt) churches would themselves form an image to the beast; hence the enforcement of Sunday-keeping in the United States would be an enforcement of the worship of the beast and his image (copy/likeness/reflection of the Papacies doctrines){GC88 448.4}

Pioneers who once taught but gave up the Three Angel's Messages of Revelation 14:6-12:

  • D. M. Canright apostized from eternal truth - some of the brightest lights will go out from the Three Angel's Messages: 
Here is an excerpt from a letter Canright wrote after leaving the Adventist church:

My Present Standing

By D. M. Canright


When a prominent man leaves one church or party and joins an opposing one and gives his reasons for it he may expect that his old associates will reply to him. I expected no exception in my own when I renounced Adventism, so have not been disappointed. The great majority of my former brethren have been very friendly to me and treated me kindly. A few, a very few, have done otherwise. Their object has been to counteract my influence against what they regard as God's work. These few have started the report that I have been sorry I left Adventism, that I have said so, have tried to return to them, have confessed that my book was false, and some have said that I was very poor, a physical and mental wreck, with no hope of salvation, etc. These reports are accepted as facts by honest brethren and repeated till they are believed by many Adventists the world over. I have denied them in every possible way, but they are still believed and repeated, and doubtless always will be. I leave God to judge between us.

I now and here for the hundredth time solemnly affirm before God that I renounced Adventism because I believed it to be an error. I have never once regretted that I did so, have never intimated to any one that I have had the least desire to go back to that people. It would be impossible for me to do such a thing and be an honest man.

I am now (1915) well in body and mind, have a good home worth $10,000 or $12,000, and have four grown children, of whom any man would be proud. On leaving the Adventists I joined the Baptist church at Otsego, Mich., and became its pastor till it was built up into a prosperous church. They have been my ardent friends to this day. Twenty years ago I moved to Grand Rapids, Mich., took a new mission and built this up, organized it into a church which has become one of the strong churches of the city, having several hundred members with a fine edifice. Have twice been its pastor, always an active member. At present I teach a large adult Bible class every Lord's day and often preach for them. Have always been in perfect harmony with the church. They honor me as their father, consult me on all important matters, and hotly resent the foolish reports which some circulate concerning me.

Out of scores of printed testimonies before me I select only a few which speak for themselves. —Seventh-day Adventism Renounced by D. M. Canright, p.9.